Jump to content

Contax G 45mm Zeiss Planar f/2 weird ring


felixeter
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey all, made some pictures with today with my 45mm Contax lens and Techart adapter and this weird ring started appearing. It's not really vignetting in the way that I am familiar - it does not happen with my 55mm 1.8 or the 90mm Zeiss Sonnar mounted on the same adapter, so I'm inclined to think it's lens specific but not sure. I hadn't noticed this in previous use with this lens, and I don't know what could have changed it. It happens at all shutter speeds with efcs turned on and off and it gets a little more pronounced with a smaller f stop as you would expect things to come in to sharper focus. I tried removing the lens hood and UV filter just in case that was somehow showing up even though it never did on the film camera - but that didn't change anything. I'm aware it could be some bizarre refraction issue or something given the beach scene, but it happened last night and this morning on the beach and again not with the other lenses.  It's weird.... 

 

Any thoughts appreciated. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this possible to address DIY in any way? I generally use native lenses except with my Sony so I haven't come into these issues before. No problems of this nature with the other lenses on this adapter, even in crazy bright sun - weird. (I did have the EFCS issue with the 28) 

 

Thanks for replying. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, adapter is flocked - you still think it's a reflection?

If so what else could help?

   

Possibly edges of one or more elements is not well blacked. 

IOW this lens would very likely do this on any digital camera. 

There's an extra reflective bounce in digital gear that didn't 

happen with film gear ... film is not a "mirror" surface but the 

flat glass filter pack in front of the sensor is exactly that. 

   

Use of a lens hood and choice of aperture can offer some 

relief from this effect, but not in every shooting condition. 

There really are a few lenses that are close to hopeless for 

use on digital cameras :-( 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm - I don't think I did but I will check that out - honestly, I don't know my Sony super well as I set it up for my purposes when I got it and don't tend to mess with it, so that could be it. But not sure why that would only occur with this one lens. I had EFCS turned on for months without knowing, it never affected my pictures until it did (high shutter speed, wide angle, bright sun), and I had to figure that out haha.

 

Can you point me to that other thread so I can see if any other behavior was similar?

Thank you!

 

** Edit - can't find this option in the menu - but I only ever shoot RAW so I'm not sure this would apply? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I had a somewhat similar problem with the old Minolta 2.8/50 macro lens.

Here it was a light spot in the middle of the frame on pictures with small entry pupil (f/8 or higher) against a bright background.

This was caused by the nearly flat back lens of the macro - it bounces the light reflected from the sensor back to the central spot.

Sony then changed the geometry of the back lens, and also the coatings are better nowadays.

 

Just an idea...
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use this lens with Metabones adapter, I can shoot directly into the sun with a Gobe Schott filter fitted, with no rings, no flair, excellent contrast, on both of my A7rm2's, the lens works perfectly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same combo of gear (Contax G 45 + Techart adapter + A7ii) but have never seen this phenomenon.

 

Grasping at straws a bit here ... how do you process your RAW files?  Is it possible, for example, that you have Lightroom set to apply lens correction on import, and that's the cause of what appears to be anti-vignetting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This adapter for electronic communication pretends to be a lens that has corrections. The setting to change is lens corrections. By default the lens corrections are set to auto. If you set to off the circle disappears.

You think this is it? In some situations the ring hasn't appeared, which is why I'm not sure.

I'll try it tomorrow in the daylight though and see if I can notice any difference. 

 

I have the same combo of gear (Contax G 45 + Techart adapter + A7ii) but have never seen this phenomenon.

 

Grasping at straws a bit here ... how do you process your RAW files?  Is it possible, for example, that you have Lightroom set to apply lens correction on import, and that's the cause of what appears to be anti-vignetting?

Nah, that's not it - I can actually see this happening in the viewfinder while I'm shooting and on image review on the camera back before the file even makes it to the computer. It's also different from an anti-vignette I think because it's a white ring - but the white doesn't go all the way to the corners, which I would think it would do if it were a vignette fix. Either way, in LR I have no lens correction applied on import for my Contax G + Sony combo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Felixeter, any progress, I hope?

 

Just as a side note of (possible) interest, the Techart Mark 3 (Golden Eagle) adapter does report the correct focal length and maximum aperture for the actual lens, and identifies it as full frame.  Older Techart adapters had the quirk of reporting the Contax lens as APS-C size. The adapter also identifies the lens (any lens mounted) as "0mm F0.0 SAM."  This appears to be the catch-all ID for any adapter with electronic contacts.  For example, a Canon lens on a Metabones adapter gets the same lens ID.  Lightroom does appear to have a builtin profile for this catch-all "SAM"  ID which applies minimal processing on import.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Felixeter, any progress, I hope?

 

Just as a side note of (possible) interest, the Techart Mark 3 (Golden Eagle) adapter does report the correct focal length and maximum aperture for the actual lens, and identifies it as full frame.  Older Techart adapters had the quirk of reporting the Contax lens as APS-C size. The adapter also identifies the lens (any lens mounted) as "0mm F0.0 SAM."  This appears to be the catch-all ID for any adapter with electronic contacts.  For example, a Canon lens on a Metabones adapter gets the same lens ID.  Lightroom does appear to have a builtin profile for this catch-all "SAM"  ID which applies minimal processing on import.

I actually haven't been able to get out and shoot yet to reproduce this (doesn't seem to be a problem in indoor environments) - but given that it doesn't happen with my 28mm lens and I can see it in the viewfinder while I'm shooting I really am not sure how it would be a software correction issue - but when I shoot again I will try turning off lens correction and back on and see if I see any changes out in the field. Will report back when I get to it. I do use the techart 3 (golden eagle) version of the adapter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
    • PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP I had the same issue Couldnt find the videos  even thought it played on the camera  found them all in here   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...