Jump to content

On1 Photo Raw


Guest all8
 Share

Recommended Posts

New member here, but I joined after downloading and using the ON1 software for the past two days and wanted to share my views on this app vs Capture One Pro 10.

 

I've been using Capture One for less than a year after having to switch from my beloved Aperture. I used Aperture since its release in 2005 and was dreading the day I would need to give it up. (Damn you, Apple, for killing one of the best applications I've ever used!) Anyway, Capture One has what I consider probably the finest RAW engine available, but the limitations of the software are killing me. The asset management is horrifyingly bad and there are many tales of people losing access to their entire database of photos after something as simple as a crash of the app. (This happened to me ... several times.)

 

Someone suggested ON1 Photo RAW and I downloaded the trial version. So far, I'm pressed with the app, though it does have some limitations of its own. 

 

I opened the same RAW file in both apps and placed them side-by-side on my iMac's screen. Then I snapped screenshots as I worked in each app. At the end, I exported from each app to a 16-bit uncompressed TIFF. For sharing purposes here, I exported those from Apple's Preview app to full quality JPEGs so there would be no possible difference in the JPEG compression. At the end of this post, I'll link to the full resolution JPEG files so you can download them for your own perusal.

 

Upon opening the file, each app shows a very different version based on their respective RAW engines (Capture One on left; ON1 Photo RAW on right):

(Click me for full-size image)

i-K9wFrTw-L.png

 

Turning on the app's respective clipping features show just how much work we need to do:

(Click me for full-size image)

i-CGKggb9-L.png

 

After a few adjustments to get the image looking normal in each app, we have this. No color adjustments so far:

(Click me for full-size image)

i-GhQK4zg-L.png

 

They look okay, but zooming in reveals some weird green halo issues around the white water tank in the ON1 image:

(Click me for full-size image)

i-jfW93TD-L.png

 

I did away with ON1's main Tone & Color adjustments and used a Tone Enhancer filter with a Luminosity Mask in the Effects module. This may be ON1's greatest advantage for editing complex images as I could easily apply the toning to only the overexposed parts of the image without difficult manual masking. It mostly cleared up the green halos. At this point, I also applied the best available sharpening in each app. I turned up Capture One's halo suppression to 100 and used ON1's shadow protection in that app's Sharpening filter module. Capture One's sharpening is clearly superior, but ON1 is not far behind:

(Click me for full-size image)

i-QCnxXnZ-L.png

 

Sharpening examples:

(Click me for full-size image)

i-dMDJdFJ-L.png

 

Next, I tried to exactly match each image to the other using the respective color and effects adjustments. ON1 here is vastly better than Capture One, as it has just a better array of adjustable elements and masks. It was much easier for me to make ON1's image look like Capture One's than it was to make Capture One's look like ON1.

(Click me for full-size image)

i-xQ666xW-L.png

 

This is the end result. You can see in the full-size images that Capture One has better noise reduction; ON1's noise is blotchy and leads to messy exports. If, like me, you use something like Silver Efex Pro for black and white conversions, you'll want clean files to work with. On the other hand, ON1 has a very efficient workflow and doesn't rely on a proprietary catalog to store photos. I love that. For now, I think ON1 is good, but I can't justify spending the money for a license when Capture One's output is just that much better. Lately I've been making some pretty big prints (forty-eight inches on the long edge), so I really do need all the resolution I can get, and Capture One gives me that. When ON1 catches up with the few missing features, maybe I will be able to overlook its RAW engine shortcomings, but not yet. 

(Click me for Capture One full-size image - 25.5MB)  (Click me for ON1 Photo RAW full-size image - 25.1MB)

i-hbtkpLL-XL.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...