Jump to content

Sony "Pro" E mount Camera


Mars1954
 Share

Recommended Posts

My shooting buddy is a Sony pro.  He's using the e-mount A7M2 and the A7S and the RX1. I use the A7R.  Both of us are enthusiastic about our gear. We like the smaller, lighter profile of the A7 equipment.  We've been carrying the message to the masses that this is the way to go.  But, he's backsliding!  He confessed to me that he misses the larger traditionally 35mm sized bodies.  He's been eyeing my A900 and we have been rehashing the notion that commercial and/or sophisticated consumers of digital photo services tend to disdain the e-mount gear as nonprofessional.  The upshot of this is that in my opinion if Sony wants to market a "pro" e-mount, they are going to have to package it as a more substantial appearing system. The update of the A7 to A7M2 somewhat addresses that objective with a heavier frame and improved ergonomics. There may need to be a "flagship" model with a 50 mpxl sensor and onboard computer/communication enhancements. They may even have to raise the price of the "pro" just to be consistent with the exclusive quality image they are seeking to get across. The same thing that Cadillac does when it marks up its Chevrolet equivalent models by thousands of dollars. Sony might put out a "safari" model that a pro could take into a jungle war zone with confidence. 

 

This is my thinking, I look forward to seeing what other responses you get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think with all systems that break away from the dominant tech, they will be treated with suspicion by many.

 

Personally I think the A series cameras are fantastic and in most aspects, every bit as capable as their Nikon and Canon rivals and in some areas superior.

 

Certainly in terms of absolute image quality my A7R outclasses any Canon sensor and that's the main reason, together with the weight factor, that I switched.

 

If Sony do produce a 'pro' A series body I think that they need to keep it within a similar weight catagory and with a competitive price to maintain momentum.

 

You've also got Fuji and Olympus producing first class smaller systems that are becoming increasingly popular.

 

Eventually the big two will have to look at downsizing their brick-like bodies as many photographers I've spoken to do get fed up of lugging around all of that weight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So there is a rumor that there will be a Sony E mount Pro camera

released in the future what will that mean? High ISO capabilities,

Large Megapixel count, dual card slots? any one have any thoughts

on what "pro" is going to mean?

  

Nothing. it's a meaningless invented marketing term.

Means nothing. OK, it does mean something. It's an

antonym of "con", meaning "in favor of". We're all in

favor of Sony upgrading these products, right ? 

  

Link to post
Share on other sites

......... Sony might put out a "safari" model .....

take into a jungle war zone with confidence. 

........ 

 

  

Get with the program. Standard issue imaging

gear for war zones is a cell phone. You don't

need expensive lenses and 50mp sensors for

that kinda of coverage.

  

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...