Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Howdy folks, I decided that I "want" a TTL flash. My old Nikon SB-700 works fine but when I'm at a shoot or an event, fiddling with power and adjusting my camera and flash is not what I want to be worried about. 

 

I'd prefer a top-mount controller that offers TTL so I can shoot with the flash held in hand or on a stand. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just learning off-camera flash and have been using the Phottix Mitros + for Sony flash and Phottix Odin wireless receiver/transmitter.

 

http://www.phottixstore.com/store/hot-shoe-flashes/phottix-mitros-plus-ttl-tranceiver-flash-for-sony-iso.html

 

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1011934-REG/phottix_ph89047_odin_ttl_flash_trigger.html

 

This system should meet all your needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware the Phottix may not work in TTL/HSS or even manual mode with un-chipped adapted lenses ( what i see in your signature may work except for the Voigtlander or any future lens without a chip communicating to the body)

 

I am awaiting a Mitros+ with MIS shoe to try further but up to now, all my attempts with the Odin adapted from the Minolta/Sony auto lock shoe have failed.

 

I also just tried a Meike MK320 with MIS shoe and it also DOES NOT WORK IN TTL with adapted lenses.

 

Still awaiting news of Nissan Di700 Air users to see if tried it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware the Phottix may not work in TTL/HSS or even manual mode with un-chipped adapted lenses ( what i see in your signature may work except for the Voigtlander or any future lens without a chip communicating to the body)

 

I am awaiting a Mitros+ with MIS shoe to try further but up to now, all my attempts with the Odin adapted from the Minolta/Sony auto lock shoe have failed.

 

I also just tried a Meike MK320 with MIS shoe and it also DOES NOT WORK IN TTL with adapted lenses.

 

Still awaiting news of Nissan Di700 Air users to see if tried it out.

This is good information, thank you. It was really quite some time since I updated that signature ... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Shooting a cactus flower is probably where you do want to have nice bokeh. I can't recall which camera you're shooting, or maybe you haven't said, but using live view you can see what the shot will look like before you press the button. Try setting up on a flower or something stationary where you can control the background and see the changes different settings make. 
    • That's what I got from your post here: When shooting at f/11, bokeh is indeed not something you should be concerned with, unless when shooting closeup. Nearly all lenses have a polygonal iris shape at f/11 which naturally gives a more edgy rendering of out of focus areas. @Cameratose's example is perfect for demonstrating the relevance of bokeh. To some extent you can influence the backdrop of a shot, but if it is busy foliage relatively close by, it'd better not be distracting from your subject. Some lenses are able to create a more pleasing background than others, even at the same aperture setting and focal length. For the impact of the entire image one might even argue that the smoothness of the background is as relevant as the sharpness of the subject.
    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...