Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys!

I stumbled onto what seems to be a attractive offer for used a7c, and I asked the seller for shutter count.
He responded with this image:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

After asking for unedited image, i checked on couple of well now sites, and got reading of 144 shutter counts.
Some of those websites couldn't read the image at all.

This seems to me as very low considering the camera age of year and a half.

Could you please give your thoughts on this.

Thanks!

 

Edited by marvla
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • marvla changed the title to Shutter count false reading?

Thanks for your answer! 

 
 Well, I thought the only reliable way to check shutter count is by uploading an unedited image to one of the dedicated websites, in order to get correct reading.
I didn't know you can check through the camera menu as well.
 
Ok, now that I got the proper number of actuations, still the mystery remains on what was the "144" number I got from shuttertool.com (uploaded image was taken yesterday, so the very recent one)
 
Edited by marvla
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, marvla said:

Hi guys!

I stumbled onto what seems to be a attractive offer for used a7c, and I asked the seller for shutter count.
He responded with this image:

After asking for unedited image, i checked on couple of well now sites, and got reading of 144 shutter counts.
Some of those websites couldn't read the image at all.

This seems to me as very low considering the camera age of year and a half.

Could you please give your thoughts on this.

Thanks!

 

The shutter count software does not read the numbers shown in the image - it reads the metadata attached to the image, and thus shows you the shutter count of the camera which took the image, NOT the camera shown in the image.

Check the rest of the EXIF metadata in that image - was it taken with an A7C? Maybe you have the shutter count of his new camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...