Jump to content

Subject: Focus Tracking (Animal Detection) with the A7R4 Camera


Recommended Posts

My A7R4 is used to shoot birds and wildlife. Typically is is set on "Animal" Continuous AF. But when I go to the menu that shows the focus settings and Tracking, the Tracking function is not operative and I cannot seem to make it operative. Menu 1.5.  If I switch to the Subject Detection, Human, then the tracking function seems to be working.  Is there some other setting that I need to set to enable Tracking with the Animal?  And if not, why would this limitation be built into this fine camera?  Finally, if there is no direct way to do this (Tracking Animal), is there a work around  that will enable me to track birds and animals while shooting?

Edited by pcr1040
add additional comment
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks for responding.  So, my A7R4 will only track a human and not an animal?  Or, will it track an animal only if it remains in Human setting, not animal?    This is an important question for me since most of my shooting with the A7R4 s of animals and especially birds both stationary and in flight.  My success rate with BIF using the A7R4 and the 100-400 GM Lens, has NOT been very good.  I did much better with my former system, the Panasonic G9 with 100-400mm Pana lens.  Given my poor success rate with the Sony system, I wonder if my settings on the A7R4 are incorrect for BIF.  Should I not use the Animal setting?  Should I use a larger focus area and not the focus tracking setting?  Should I use shutter focus, not Back button focus?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark Galer who is a Sony Artisan has a good book on the A7RIV as well as several you tube videos on how to to set up your camera. Take a look at these. They should help you with your situation with tracking. All can be found for free on the web. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • Hello ! A friend gave me an old Sony SLT A65 that was locked in a suitcase for some years and guess what... It was pretty dirty. The translucent mirror looks strange. I know it's a pellicle mirror, but something is really weird , at least to me who never saw this entity before. It shows a rainbow pattern when lit, like a diffraction grid. And when I point the camera to a strong light source, let´s say streets lights or car lights, a huge halo and a diffuse pattern appears, almost like one of that photographic filters from the '70s. I guess the mirror is damaged. Does enyone have any experience with this ? I managed to remove the mirror and carefully rinse it with water and detergent solution , rinse again and dry, but the rainbow patter persists. My question is basically about the translucent mirror behavior with strong highlights and if the rainbow pattern on its surface is normal.   Thanks!  
    • Sounds like you need a manual, and you are correct different settings can affect what you can do in the drive more.  Did you simple press the DRIVE button and select the THREE rectangles? There are several "burst" modes -- that you set with the Fn button or DRIVE button.  One takes several photos, when you press the button once (CONTINUOUS).  Another requires you to press the shutter button each time (SINGLE).  When you press the DRIVE button, what icon shows up -- a single rectangle or three?
    • If the 18-105 is too bulky, then so is the Tamron 17-70. Quality wise however, definately pick the Tamron over the Sony Zeiss 16-70, which is a compromised and dated design and similar in quality to the 18-105. I was in the same boat as you for a while (also had the 16-50 kit lens and 18-105 f/4), and went with the Sony 16-55 F/2.8 G. Happy with the choice as it's more compact than the Tamron 17-70 and vastly better quality than the Zony 16-70. In your case however, the omission of stabilized optics might be a dealbreaker. Did you consider the tiny but decent Sigma 18-50 f/2.8?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...