Jump to content

Recommended Posts

After a long run with DSLRs, hard rock guitar playing and 100+ mile long ride with my bicycle, I have problems with my wrists on both hands. Heavy things are not for me to fool around for long walks. What is the lightest full frame lens that I can get for my A7 II? Are there many options with and without adapters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Samyang 35mm f/2.8 is about as small and light as it gets if you want AF. Lens weighs about 80 grams. Don't own the lens but reportedly image quality is pretty decent considering the weight and cost of the lens. Arguably on par with the 35 f/2.8 Sony/Zeiss.

Edited by Pieter
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Pieter said:

The Samyang 35mm f/2.8 is about as small and light as it gets if you want AF. Lens weighs about 80 grams. Don't own the lens but reportedly image quality is pretty decent considering the weight and cost of the lens. Arguably on par with the 35 f/2.8 Sony/Zeiss.

It looks tinny and well priced. I will certainly go for one. That will make it and unbeatable mirrorless bundle. Quite lightweight and very capable nevertheless.

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

One of the first lens I bought was the Sony FE 35 f2.8. Nice, compact and the reverse lens hood. I still own it and use occasionally if doing "prime only". I find my favorite walkaround is the 16-35 f4, coupled with the 55 Sony/Zeiss (the second lens I purchased) in my pocket/light lens (no camera space) bag.

Edited by tizeye
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
On 8/21/2020 at 10:55 AM, Pieter said:

The Samyang 35mm f/2.8 is about as small and light as it gets if you want AF.

Secound that!

I used to have one and it was practically glued onto my A7 Mark I. I regret selling it, but when I went the APS-C route it didn't make sense to me any more.

As I'm back at FF, I bought the Samyang 24mm which is in the same ballpark and makes for a very nice landscape and city-combo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...