Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One question though, is Brian Smith on Sony's payroll? The "gear" section of his website might as well point to http://store.sony.com 

Well it's the gear he uses,, no doubt,, like any professional photographer he gets credit and discounts for directing people to the manufactures webpage.

Nikon, Canon professional photographers do the same.

Does he get paid by Sony? who knows maybe,, but the point is this.

He is an established Photographer, well known for his work and he's done it using Sony cameras.

If you look at his work you should be able to see why.

He wasn't getting squat from Sony when he started out using a a700 and old Minolta lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall another "famous" photographer from another brand who swore black and blue that he was not on X's payroll, except when he was doing shoots for X (where he was paid above his normal rate), in some exotic locations with a complement of guides ... so thats when he was on X's payroll   :rolleyes:  Then, to confuse things further, he posted an image of all his gear from company X and it turned out that most of it was given to him by company X.

 

But still he swears he was not on X's payroll   :lol:

 

 

 

Brian Smith is really a great photographer, I don't think the camera has much to do with it, but he does seem pretty happy with Sony gear   :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matt Granger refers to himself as "That Nikon Guy" and that's just fine.

Point is. Sony cameras are very much ABLE to be used for professional photography. it ultimately lays in the abilities of the photographic artist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give my nan a Canon 1Dx and a pro a point and shoot - I know who will have the best photos.

Well obviously the point and shoot would make a better image because a 1Dx alone (without a lens) makes terrible images. ;):P:D

 Seriously though,

i'm sure with her experience in life, your Nan would make awesome photographs.

But what if we gave the Dx1 to a 5 year old and the point and click to your Nan, No doubt Again your Nan would make better photographs

The ability to make good composition and interesting photos is a necessity, no matter what resolution or quality ones camera is.

 

 Of course in this thread, we are not talking about low resolution point and click cameras. ;)

But Interestingly, pros also use point and clicks

15 Digital Point-and-Shoot Cameras Used By Pro Photographers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...