Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.   I ordered a new Sony A7Riv last month and I also ordered two M series sony cards.    Now I'm wondering if I need the faster G series.   Anyone have experience with these cards.  The new camera takes the UH 2 cards, so the cards are expensive.   Any thoughts appreciated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jstevensphoto said:

Anyone have experience with these cards

Instead of relying on somebody's experience, I compare the requirements of the body to the capabilities of the memory card, in that the body can deliver data at a certain rate, and the card's write speed must always match (or exceed), what the body can deliver. Both information can be obtained from technical specifications.

That said:

the A7Riv delivers an impressive 61 MP image, which results in an uncompressed raw file size of around 102 MB. Even at 10 fps burst rate, this will not be the maximum "sustained" data rate which the camera can deliver, because the burst first goes into a limited-size internal buffer, from where the data is released into the memory card at a rate which the memory card does sustain. I wouldn't worry about stills shooting.

When recording video, the most demanding would be 4K @30/25fps, at a maximum sustained data rate of 100 MB/s:

Quote
IMAGE SIZE (PIXELS), NTSC
XAVC S 4K: 3840 x 2160 (30p, 100 M), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 100 M), 3840 x 2160 (30p, 60 M), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 60 M), XAVC S HD: 1920 x 1080 (120p, 100M), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60M), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50M), 1920 x 1080 (30p, 50M), 1920 x 1080 (24p, 50M), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 25M), 1920 x 1080 (30p, 16M), AVCHD: 1920 x 1080 (60i, 24M, FX), 1920 x 1080 (60i, 17M, FH)
IMAGE SIZE (PIXELS), PAL
XAVC S 4K: 3840 x 2160 (25p, 100M), 3840 x 2160 (25p, 60M), XAVC S HD:1920 x 1080 (100p, 100M), 1920 x 1080 (100p, 60M), 1920 x 1080 (50p, 50M), 1920 x 1080 (25p, 50M), 1920 x 1080 (50p, 25M), 1920 x 1080 (25p, 16M), AVCHD: 1920 x 1080 (50i, 24 M, FX), 1920 x 1080 (50i, 17 M, FH)

Sony "G"-type memory cards are specified as capable of sustained write speeds (on an unfragmented media) of 150 MB/s, so you'll be fine with those.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the info.   I just changed my B&H order and got the Sony 128 G series cards, instead of the M series.   I don't do a lot of video, but at least I am ready if I suddenly want to shoot video.    I have never used compressed RAW, but I may consider it for shooting with this camera.    When I shoot commercially, I always use uncompressed RAW, just in case I need to bring up shadows, etc. Thanks again for the excellent info.  

6 hours ago, Chrissie said:

 

Sony "G"-type memory cards are specified as capable of sustained write speeds (on an unfragmented media) of 150 MB/s, so you'll be fine with those.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AI sez: The CHIPFANCIER CFexpress Type A 4.0 memory card offers 1700MB/s read speeds and is VPG400 certified, making it suitable for 8K video and high-speed shooting. However, some users have reported limitations in frame rates with this card.  Don't know if that applies, but it sounds similar. Any chance on using/getting a different card? The A7 IV has a ridiculous buffer, it shouldn't slow down at all with a good card. 
    • Make sure camera and lens is updated to latest firmware. 
    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...