Jump to content

Deep under Byron Glacier


Jake Sloan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I spent some time this last winter crawling hundreds of feet into Byron glacier and the ice caves under it. These are a few of the pictures I took with my A7iii. The column was lit by a ray of light from a crevasse above and the column next to my friend was light by me using a small battery powered light. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2019 at 7:34 AM, LiveShots said:

Wow.... I had no idea it was possible to walk under a glacier. Good shots

Yeah you can in certain places but I don’t recommend it unless you have a guide or experience. They can be incredibly dangerous 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hola,si si es muy peligroso opino igual con esto del cambio climatico,las fotos espectaculares las dos, es una pena o una opinion que el personaje de la primera no se le veria con mochila piolet ect ect es decir con equipo de montaña completo ?

Salu2 de Felipe ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...