Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hy there,

i have troubles filming at low light scenarios using my SONY ALPHA 7 III, grain is always present.
What i read until now is that it is simply not possible filming with HD without getting grain.

If there is low light, you need to use 4K, and the best option for this is 24p 100M.
I tried using shutter speed of 1/50 (double the fps)

Even when keeping ISO low (1000 - 3000 MAX) i am still seeing grain on my pc when I import the files.

What i also found out is that (for best low light result) a picture profile should be used, but i did not try that until now.

In my opinion it should also be possible without picture profile, shouldnt it?

My shooting scenario is simply my flat, where i am lowering the lights and keep moving around with the camera.

What i am doing wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Michael,

I was having similar issues video low light capabilities. I linked a video below by Joshyeo that helped me achieve better results. He goes over settings and profiles to shoot with to get clean footage. To summarize what he said in a few sentences, here are the recommended low light settings.

 

Custom Profile

1. Menu - Picture profiles

2. PP2 - Right on dial

3. Black Level -2

4. Gamma Still

5. Black Gamma -2

6. Color Mode - Pro

7. Saturation -4

8. Detail -7 (Make sure to sharpen in post)

9. PLAY WITH SETTINGS AN FIND WHAT WORKS FOR YOU!

What if you want to shoot in 120fps?

"120p is clean in the day, and noisy in low light. so use a very fast lens, try bringing in practicals or use ambient line. use the profile I made, but keep gamma and black gamma at 0. and last try breaking the 180 degree shutter rule. You may be able to get away with shooting 1/125 shutter speed instead of having to shoot 1/250 (this will vary from subject to subject, the slower moving subject the better) GOOD LUCK!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hjyu2s0JawQ 

 

I hope this helps!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answer.

Can you maybe tell me the settings which you achieved the best results with?

Do you shoot HD or 4k?

So i assume the usage of an Picture Profile is mandatory, but for a (not beginner, but also no pro) like me, i am afraid of using picture profiles because i read a lot that you have to keep footage over/under exposed. So i want to avoid it, because i will shoot scenarios where i cannot waste much time on experimenting with perfect exposure settings (Wedding)

Edited by michaelschnepf
Link to post
Share on other sites

I shoot in HD, but I usually only switch between three Picture Profiles using HLOG, SLOG or the setting in the video. If this seems all too complicated, I would just shoot using a Creative Style that looks closest to real life on the spot. Then keep my histogram on the display to update exposure according to lighting conditions. In the case of a Wedding, I would most likely shoot in Hlog.

If you plan to use no Slow Motion, I'd shoot in 4k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply,

but what i ment is how your low light settings are, if you strictly followed the instructions of the guy, or made some for yourself.

What do you do if the video is too dark, and f is at the lowes 1.8 for example, do you change the shutter speed accordingly and break the 180 degree rule, or play with iso?

My (maybe amateur) thought is: always play with shutter speed first and then change the ISO (but not above 6400). What do others think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends. If I want slo-mo and Im getting grain at 120fps, I'd go to 60fps. Then I'd first make sure the shutter speed isn't more than twice the frame rate, so 60fps at 1/125. Second, is turning up the ISO (Preferably no more than 4000-6400 max). If the picture quality is still bad shooting at; F1.8__60fps__1/125__ISO6400; Then I'll have to shoot at 24 or 30fps to turn down the shutter speed and retain Picture Quality.

Weddings usually aren't that low in lighting conditions especially during the main ceremony. Either way, the best way to play it safe is to go to the location of the wedding before hand to get a glimpse of lighting before hand to adjust your settings accordingly.

If all that doesn't work, the last result will be to get a flash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Low light solution is just to add light. You have to remember that low-light has not really evolved over time.

With TV networks you can see the grainy red residue. On my A7RII via a 35Mm unofficial lens that redness is displayed. With my G lens it is not present.

Another problem is the display on the A7RII sucks in comparison to an external display. I use an external display that is setup like a television display.

Which is completely different from what the camera sees and what you get. So you could consider setting up via an external display because it is a big difference then what is recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@DanArt i see what you are saying. But what i read so far is that the sony a7iii is one best option for low light (some film scenes by the light of the moon only).

@elgoproslowmo means Hd, if you talk about 24 30 fps you mean 4k i guess?

 

What do you think happens with the video if you simply turn down shutter speed in order to get a brighter image, does the grain go up or what does affect grain in a video in your opinion?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found with my A7r2 that the built in exposure metering  consistently suggests settings that actually give a overexposed look despite showing as neutral exposure on the display EV scale.

 I got used to that when shooting raw and always exposed raw at that suggested level, which allowed head room for recovery while allowing the black to show detail with out grain at higher iso settings.

However when shooting video that built in overexposure does cause a issue when using non log profiles, in that the over exposure does not take kindly to recovery.

Using a log profile however does seem to like the overexposure suggested by the metering with the exposure being reasonably gradeable.

Using a remote monitor with false colours and adjusting the exposure to obtain what the false colours show as a correct exposure results in the camera display showing one stop underexposed.

So , for me , shooting video with non log profiles I use one stop under and , for log profiles and for raw stills , one stop over works for me regardless of the ambient lighting available.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, 4k is its really bad. Lowering the shutter speed will not affect image quality, but it may cause unpleasant motion blur. That's why twice the FPS is the recommended shutter speed in video. A balance between motion blur and "robot-looking" motion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, michaelschnepf said:

@adwb with non slog you mean everything which is not slog2 and slog3 , e.g. cine4?

 

 

On my body I have various profiles set but the only two that use slog gamma is pp6/7

:-

pp1-5 I use under expose -1

for pp6/7 I use 1 stop over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answers. I will head out next days to test all the settings, i will give you feedback.

As you seem to be experienced sonya7iii users, i want to ask an additional question:
As i started filming about 1/2 year ago, i wanted to upgrade my stuff step by step.

1) i want to film HD at a wedding, because i need slowmotion. What setting do you recommend? I did 2 videos so far (couple video and a image movie for a club).
I filmed HD 50fps 50M. As the result was pretty good, i thought about keeping this setting also for the wedding i am filming (also because the amount of data is less so i do not need to buy a huge amount of sd cards by now)

Would you recommend to switch to a different setting (assuming enough light is present)

2)When filming a wedding, i need to ensure that no data is lost.
So i thought about saving the data on 2 cards parallely.
What do you think, how much SD cards do i need for this (i am booked for about 10 hours), referencing to the settings you recommend?

3) same question as 2 but for the battery?
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

shoot at 50/60p all the time, use a 24p timeline in your editor watch the attched links ,

https://www.premiumbeat.com/blog/how-to-achieve-perfect-slow-motion-results-in-post/

http://frontside.de/dls/pan.htm

Regarding batteries for video use , look on amazon for remote  battery https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00S5FSZZO/?coliid=IKH3XFI83XSR9&colid=2UVJ3ZA03XP59&psc=1&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it

regards alistair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip, i already did use this settings by now. Nice to see that those settings are used by others too.

Regarding SD cards i made a test:

10 Seconds of 4K/24p/100M = 127 MB = 516 Sequences = 5160 Seconds = 86 MIN
10 Seconds of HD/50p/50M = 66 MB  = 992 Sequences = 9920 Seconds = 2,75hours 

As i plan to film in HD mainly, and to use 2 cards simultanously, i should be fine to buy 4 cards don't you think? I am booked for 8 hours.
So i can film full 5.5h if i want to (will not happen), what do you think?

Are you using such a thing like a remote battery, and does it work? I was thinking about getting 4 batteries (maybe not original but cheaper ones) and a charger where i can charge 2 batterys simultanously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So as i could figure out this battery solution belongs to the battery NP-FW50 used by the SONA A7 II

The SONY A7 III uses the NP-FZ100 battery and i cannot find above solution for this type of battery, and i think this will not work out.

What happens if the voltage is too high, it will simply crash and the camera is dead, so don't you think that this is a bit risky?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry ,did not spot the wrong camera was think8ng of mine, but if you look on Amazon for your battery, you will see dummy battery packs with usb leads that you can plug into a remote usb battery pack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...