Jump to content

Mylène, portrait and bokeh (Minolta 100/2 on Alpha 7)


fute77
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Here is a result from a photo session made in june

 

I am really in love with the good old minolta 100/2. I have compared it with the CZ 85/1.4 (a mount) and it stand the comparision

 

let me know what you think 

 

29016647775_64709bcb77_b.jpg

loneliness by Fabrice, sur Flickr

 

Sony Alpha 7 with LA-EA3 and Minolta 100/2

 

ISO 125 f/3.5 1/320s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope.  

  

Need to stop down, and open up ...  

your iris and your eyes, respectively.

 

Subject is very well photographed.

Thaz really without question, light,

expression, etc, all really well done. 

  

The "stop down ... open up" thing is

about the reeeeally unfortunate item

rising up out of her spine or shoulder.

  

I see that as a result of a trusting in

rather wide apertures to relieve the

photographer from needing to keep

an eye on backgrounds. IMNSHO,

the distracting background object is

something SO obvious that anyone

who was even partially watching for

background problems could not fail

to catch it. But the belief that a wide

f/stop will allow one to concentrate

only on the subject is misleading. It

did result in a really great rendition

of the subject ... thaz way cool ! But

it seriously marred the total image  

by allowing that uncool background

thing to intrude as much as it does. 

It's a drag, cuz so much else is just

so verrrry beautifully done :-( 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the risk of sounding crazy, let me suggest a camera

feature. It will never be produced, but one can learn to

do this with one's mind, instead of relying on a device.

  

OK, here's the design concept for the feature. It's NOT

for SLRs, only for live view cameras. One key ability of

live view cameras is presenting a full brightness image

for viewing, even if viewing thru a smallish f/stop. The

purpose is to warn of distracting backgrounds.

  

The idea is to sequence the iris and shutter as follows.

In this example, the f/stop intended for good exposure

is f/2.8. So here's the sequence: 

 

1. Viewing/composing at stopped down to  f/5.6 or f/8. 

2. AF activation or MF-aid causes opening to fully open.

3. Cessation of focus action drops iris back to f/5.6 or 8.

4. Instant before shutter opens, iris opens to f/2.8 [the

f/stop intended for good exposure].  

  

The essence here is to bring background objects into

more noticeable focus, even tho they will be somewhat

softened at the actual f/stop for the exposure. Reason

for this is that, even tho soft-focused, many background

objects should not be ignored. Problem is that objects 

look more distracting in a finished photograph than they

seem while composing and timing the original exposure.

  

I repeat that describing the feature is a conceptual way

of explaining the need to practice a visual skill. It's not

that I imagine the feature ever being implemented.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...