Jump to content

Newton Ring issue with FE 16-35mm f2.8


Recommended Posts

I am using sony a7r2 for a couple of months, the major issue I have while shooting night photos is I have weird circular formations in the sky portion of the image. I am a beginner any help would be appreciated to solve this.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What your images have in common is, that the sky fades very gradually from the bright city atmosphere to the darker "outer space". To make this appear as a continuous transition requires more different shades of the same hue than your image processing apparently supports. Since you are in the realm of digital photography, what you would like to render as continuous transitions appears as more or less disturbing steps between different hues instead. I guess, you've been shooting those pictures as jpeg only. I would advise to shoot in raw, then export as jpeg. Since jpeg supports only 256 shades per primary color, while raw may support up to 16bits (2^^16 = 65.536) per primary color.

I assume (and now I'm in the guessing territory), that the raw converter can re-allocate unused color resolution from some primary colors to increase the color resolution (i.e.: refine the inevitable "steps") to the hues where it's most needed. Maybe someone else can clarify this a bit more ...

Hope that helps.

 

P.S.: I have the same lens and would definitely rule out "Newton's rings" as the cause for your complaint.

Edited by Chrissie
Re.: Newton's rings
Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing that comes to my mind is: export to jpeg at the highest possible "quality" setting. That should considerably reduce the size of the rectangular jaggies at the boundaries between different hue steps, though not the steps themselves.

You may want to try exporting to tiff instead of jpeg, since tiff also supports high color resolution. At any rate, try an uncompressed format.

Please keep us posted.

Edited by Chrissie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...