Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I recently purchased the Sony A6000.  So far, very nice camera, loving everything about it except for the relatively mediocre battery life. 

 

I am a little confused about the operation of the camera with legacy lenses, but I'd like to learn more.  

 

What I would like to do is be able to use one of Nikon's older AIS lenses, like the 55mm f/2.8 AIS Macro:

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-55mm-Micro-Nikkor-Lens/dp/B0000BVDZZ

 

I understand that I will need an adaptor and that not all adaptors will electronically communicate.  

 

So, if I get the Metabones F-Mount Nikon adaptor, for example, will I be able to meter in aperture-priority mode, or will this be full manual?  Will the camera at least be able to meter?  Lastly, will I be adjusting the aperture via the on-lens aperture ring and the shutter speed via the camera itself?

 

This adaptor: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/983738-REG/metabones_mb_nf_e_bm2_nikon_f_to_e_mount_nex.html/prm/alsVwDtl

 

Or even the Vello, which is cheaper: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/839149-REG/vello_la_nex_nf_lens_mount_adapter.html/prm/alsVwDtl

 

Thanks guys. 

 

- Steve

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything you can do with a pin hole you

can do with a non-coupled adapted lens.

The advantages of such a lens over a pin

hole are that it's much sharper, and that

the size of the "pin hole" is adjustable.

  

The disadvantage of a lens over a pinhole

is that with a lens, you gotta focus it [duh] !

  

You can easily experiment with the way

your camera will behave with an adapted

non-coupled lens. Make a pin hole and

tape it over the body flange. Since you

don't need really sharp images for such

an experiment, use a really BIG pin hole,

like not pin-size but 10-penny-nail sized

or even pencil sized. The bigger hole will

provide a brighter image, more nearly

like an actual lens. Don't worry that all

your subjects look "ghostly".

  

Not joking. You imagery will be vague

but somewhat recognizable and you can

mess around with the controls to watch

what happens. You'll discover how the

difference between viewing modes will

affect things, and you can watch the "A"  

mode at work [it works normally]. With

no special cleverness at all you could

even make the pencil-hole adjustable

in size to get a better experience of the

"A" mode. You can play with the meter

in any mode. You can even use the "S"  

mode. It's not automatic exposure but it

has a somewhat different behavior than

the "M" mode.

  

Feel free to incorporate some clear

plastic or such in the "pin-hole" just to

seal the body chamber against dust.

When the camera is on, the sensor has

a mild static charge that can attract any

dust that wanders in.

 

After experimenting, if you're satisfied

with what controls and features you'll be

enjoying, adapt a lens and enjoy those

sharper brighter images !

  

  

PS: Your pin hole FL is about 1 inch, so

a 1/8" hole is about f/8, 1/4" is f/4, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Golem, understood on the pin hole concept. 

 

I was talking about the specific capabilities of these adaptors, though.  For example, I've heard that with some adaptors, you're always stuck at essentially the widest point of the lens.  

 

Here's a source that discusses this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/hands-reviews/overview-lens-adapters

 

Of course, I want more exposure control over my photography, so I want to make sure that I understand what I'm getting. 

 

Thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adapters work fine, you can either adjust aperture on the adapter or on the lens itself with nik ais glass but not in camera only shutter speed, im using 28 3.5 & 50 1.8 ai and both are great sharp bright good colour i shoot full manual but can shoot shutter priority not aperture priority or auto [hang on, or is it the other way around lol?] cos aperture can only be adjusted on the lens of course.

 

I like the nikon glass so much im buying an 85 1.4 tomorrow for 400$ for portrait, i use metabones adapter costs more but better made engineered and tolerances are tighter the cheap ebays one was ok but not quite as sharp, if you want to see results look at my gallery some shots are with 28 3.5.

 

The old nikon glass is some of the best in my op. I even used a nik 70-210 m/f macro zoom for a while, thats the pidgeon shot in my gallery, the rendering is superb.

 

p.s. You dont get all the exif data with these lenses nor any electronic contact, but doesnt matter to me.

And zoom/close focus window with peaking too works brilliantly.

 

edit, sorry i should add, the camera meters in body through the lens[so i believe],  so it will work fine 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adapters work fine, you can either adjust aperture on the adapter or on the lens itself with nik ais glass but not in camera only shutter speed, im using 28 3.5 & 50 1.8 ai and both are great sharp bright good colour i shoot full manual but can shoot shutter priority not aperture priority [hang on, or is it the other way around lol?] cos aperture can only be adjusted on the lens of course.

 

Thanks, appreciate the feedback.  What I ended up doing was buying the 55mm macro AIS lens along with the Fotga Nikon F-Mount "hollow" adaptor.  This is basically just a mount junction between the lens and the camera, no glass, no nothing.  

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009GFXIAE

 

Since it was so cheap, I'm going to test this out and, if need-be, look for other options in the future.  But for manual focus AIS lenses where I'd need to manually meter anyway, I can't imagine that I would need anything more than this. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will be fine, there a great fit for the sonys, nice and fairly compact, beautiful focus mechanism, beautiful glass.

 

That adapter will do the job no probs. I used a 16$ ebay one and it worked fine.

 

Manual shooting is just the best. Theres a distinct pleasure nailing a shot that way i say.

 

That 55 is a great lens too.

 

Sorry i over explained a bit in first post lol. Im not sure with a6000 but may be able to do auto iso+ auto shutter too with the nik glass, can on my a7m2?

 

Cos your using apsc, it will be longer mm and sharper too using only centre part of lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve,

 

I have a non-AI 55mm f/3.5 Nikkor Macro lens that I use with a Fotasy adapter.  The adapter is similar to the one you got from Fotga.  All it does is spaces the lens out from the sensor to the correct distance.  

 

Once you enable "shutter release without lens" in the menu --you are good to go.  This allows the camera to capture an image with no lens attached (which is what it thinks it is doing since it only is a dummy adapter).  

 

The adapters that have aperture control are for the AF lenses that do not have an aperture ring on the lens (like canon EF lenses) and are expecting aperture control via the camera body.  If you would use a dummy adapter with one of these lenses you would be forced to shoot wide open.  

 

As mentioned metering is TTL.  You control aperture and focus, obviously, via the lens.

 

I shoot my adapted lenses often in Aperture priority.  The camera then sets shutter speed. In this mode, ISO can either be set manually or automatically via Auto-ISO.   In more controlled shooting environments I shoot in Manual...but Auto-ISO is not available in this mode.

 

Cheers and HTH,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...