Jump to content

Recommended Posts

     My problem with my A99: The A99 viewfinder while using manual camera settings, or shutter priority, shows a different brightness level than the resulting photo does.  Way different.  In other words, the picture looks fine in the viewfinder, and on the LED screen, but the photo I take may be way too light or too dark.  This occurs when, for example, I might want to get the "milky white waterfall" effect by using a very slow shutter speed.  It looks fine in the viewfinder, with no indication to "use such-and-such-f/stop", but the recorded photo may be washed-out overexposed.  Or I will want to use my HVL-F43M flash to highlight a foreground object while increasing the shutter speed to darken the background somewhat.  Again, no indication via the viewfinder or the viewing screen as to what the resulting image will look like, so often it is way too dark.  Why?   Thank you.

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't expect the viewing image to match 

the recorded image. It normally does not.  

    

As to your faulty exposures, assuming 

you know how to meter and set settings, 

constant over exposure can be due to a 

lazy or sticking iris. 

   

If you set a normal outdoor exposure 

and shoot a normal image with no trick 

stuff, do you get a normal result ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you disable the Live View effect ? It should be ON most of the time

 

This should be disabled in situations like using studio flash ( in dark environments you won't be able to focus in Manual mode) or using manual adapted lenses. When disabled and in Manual exposure mode, the finder is trying to provide a modified image to help you focus or compose, so if your exposure setting is way over or under exposed, this is what the final picture will look like.

 

If you disable it, the finder will show you an image that is looking fine but your camera settings may not match those of the finder to the point of causing the big exposure difference you are experiencing.

 

With flash, no camera that i know of can provide a preview of what the flash light will give you as a result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get ahold of a optical viewfinder camera set it to manual and learn

how take all the same shots. Then you might see what you are asking

of your A99. I am not trying to be anything but genuine here. This

would be a great exercise for anyone who likes photography but has

never explored the knowledge needed to take the place of what the

most modern cameras do for us now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

When you do long exposures, the predictive functions of the camera won't be accurate. You just have to dial it in by taking a shot and then adjusting exposure based on the histogram and the screen image (which isn't 100% accurate either). Then take a new shot and adjust until it looks like you want it to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...