Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've found posts around the internet that the serial number sticker may come off of the lens after a short time. I'm wondering whether the serial number of the lens is also attached to it more permanently, like engraved.

 

There is an unidentified number engraved at the front of it, it's 8 digits (the serial on the sticker and the box has 7 digits) and completely different. Google doesn't find that number so it's probably not a model number. Does my lens have two serial numbers? Is that because of the Zeiss branding? (The SEL1018 doesn't have a number at the front, just the sticker at the bottom.) Some Amazon images show "00000000" at that place, maybe it's a rendered image. Other web images have smaller numbers than mine ("455xxxxx").

 

My Canon lenses (and others) only have the number engraved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had big problems with the serial number because the sticker was lost and a warranty repair from my FE 35F28Z could not done fast because of that 

 

good to write down the serial number or hold the box 

 

if you buy a lens used take care the serial number is still available  

 

the engraved number in the lens barrel is not the serial number

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can I read that data from the EXIF data? I can't find it in IrfanView or Lightroom. Photoshop won't open these files, it's too old and there are no upgrades available anymore. Affinity Photo doesn't show any file properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no serial number in the EXIF data visible to IrfanView. I know the E hotkey. Canon cameras have a camera serial number, but Sony doesn't have anything. Maybe it's hidden in the MakerNote and IrfanView can't decode it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...