Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I was still using the Nex 7 I bought from China a simple tilt adapter. It is nowhere as refined as a proper tilt lens (for one it lacks a lock for the rotation) but it did the job quite nicely for a fraction of the price (I paid for mine 25$, now they sell for 50$).

 

Supposedly it shouldn't work on full frame, but out of curiosity I tried it anyway on the A7r. Surprise: it works flawlessly (and zero light leaks, BTW)!

 

For now I shot a few frames with the 24/2.8, the 35/2.8 shift, the 50/1.8 and the 135/3.5. No vignetting or corner problems with any of them so far.

 

To see the adapter I'm talking about, and another alternative one, you can check one old post of mine:

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2014/10/17/adapters-for-a-cheap-pro-tilt-shift-lens/

 

In a couple of months I'll write a more comprehensive report of how well (or not) these solution works in landscape photography, so stay tuned (or subscribe via RSS or Facebook).

 

For the moment I'll leave you with a couple one crop (I don't seem to be able to upload the other one for some motive), just to wet your appetite.

 

A good weekend to everyone!

 

 

All images shot with the 24mm f/2.8

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

_DSC1136.jpg

 

 

Unsharpened if not for the standard amount applied by Photoshop. Please keep in mind that there was an extremely strong wind, so much so that in more than one occasion I had troubles standing up, so the sharpness may have suffered a bit (it topped my heavy tripod a couple times as well, even with the legs dipped into the snow!).

 

crop-01.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...