Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Package Choice (Hill and Usher) and Tom C. Pickard (Great American) are the two I've researched, and TCP is slightly cheaper for a decent amount more coverage. Most people I know who do this as a business now have Package Choice, but everyone's needs are different and you need to find out what your particular situation requires. If you're simply a regular joe who does this as a hobby, your home owners insurance or auto insurance can cover it fairly cheaply (1-2%). If you do it professionally, you not only need insurance on gear, but also liability insurance, which is where TCP and Package Choice come in. For approximately 10k worth of gear insurance and a barebones 1m general liability policy, you're looking at ~500 USD, depending on your local laws, taxes, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in Scotland most house contents insurance policies will cover up to a set limit (usually £2000) for loss of or damage to contents while out of the house. I found that extending that limit to cover my kit was a lot less expensive than taking out dedicated photographic cover.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys.

 

I'm not a full time photographer but I do make some money from it on the weekends.  Last year I had 6-10k worth of stuff and they all got  stolen when I was mugged.  I now just bought some of the stuff back and I don't want it to happen again so that's why I'm looking into it.   I don't really own a home, but maybe I will look into car insurance.  Thats very helpful to know. Thanks again. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All, here in the USA State Farm is the best value for camera EQ, for a non Pro that is nothing online with your name (that's what I was told) is $1.90 per $100, and as a Pro I think it was $2.50 per $100. Since I am not a working Pro I don't recall the exact cost and this insurance covers stolen and drop insurance but but not everyday wear and tear on the photo EQ.

 

So if you are in the USA it's worth looking into, also in the USA an a working Pro the PPA  Professional Photographers Association has a good insurance program.

 

Christopher

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All, here in the USA State Farm is the best value for camera EQ, for a non Pro that is nothing online with your name (that's what I was told) is $1.90 per $100, and as a Pro I think it was $2.50 per $100. Since I am not a working Pro I don't recall the exact cost and this insurance covers stolen and drop insurance but but not everyday wear and tear on the photo EQ.

 

So if you are in the USA it's worth looking into, also in the USA an a working Pro the PPA  Professional Photographers Association has a good insurance program.

 

Christopher

 

I actually contacted State Farm, and though their prices do seem reasonable for business insurance once you haggle them down, the deductible is very high. For 10k worth of gear with a 1m liability in the state of Texas, they quoted me ~450 USD with a 1000 USD equipment insurance deductible, which was unacceptable.

 

For those that don't own a house, there's also a rider you can attach to your renter's insurance, however most riders exclude you entirely if you make any money at all. If you make any sort of profit, you need business equipment insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You have to take into account that the chances for damage and fraud are VERY high and most claims will result in total replacement, unlike with most automobile cases. When you are covering just about the same cost of an automobile at 20k plus for professional equipment, you can see how they charge us an arm and a leg.

 

I use Hiscox, and they covered all my equipment, my studio, and liability insurance all in one for about 120 or so per month. I'm based in SF area. You can check them out as they have dedicated photography coverage and good rates. Absolutely a great rate for me considering all of the above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Package Choice (Hill and Usher) and Tom C. Pickard (Great American) are the two I've researched, and TCP is slightly cheaper for a decent amount more coverage. Most people I know who do this as a business now have Package Choice, but everyone's needs are different and you need to find out what your particular situation requires. If you're simply a regular joe who does this as a hobby, your home owners insurance or auto insurance can cover it fairly cheaply (1-2%). If you do it professionally, you not only need insurance on gear, but also liability insurance, which is where TCP and Package Choice come in. For approximately 10k worth of gear insurance and a barebones 1m general liability policy, you're looking at ~500 USD, depending on your local laws, taxes, etc.

I have insurance with TCP zero problems but also zero claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AI sez: The CHIPFANCIER CFexpress Type A 4.0 memory card offers 1700MB/s read speeds and is VPG400 certified, making it suitable for 8K video and high-speed shooting. However, some users have reported limitations in frame rates with this card.  Don't know if that applies, but it sounds similar. Any chance on using/getting a different card? The A7 IV has a ridiculous buffer, it shouldn't slow down at all with a good card. 
    • Make sure camera and lens is updated to latest firmware. 
    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...