Jump to content

Recommended Posts

How much do you want to spend? The Minolta 50/2.8 Macro was a pretty decent lens and can be had for around $100 US these days. For that matter the original issue Minolta 1.7 was good and can be found for $25 or so. There are a lot of 50 A-Mount offerings, most of them are 1.4 and 1.7. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rollsman4 said:

How is the IQ on the Minolta Maxxum 50 1.7?   Ty I appreciate it   

It's pretty good, I had one and used it on film, several A-Mounts, and an A7 IV. No complaints, but you do have to understand you're using a lens that was released in 1985. Minolta's colors are fantastic, but as any older lens coatings for flare were a bit lacking back then. Don't expect it to perform like a more modern lens, for the money though try it and see what you think. 

I could recommend a Sigma DG HSM Art for $500 but it doesn't help if it's out of your range.

It's best when asking for a recommendation to give us as much info as possible. Expectations, budget, use, etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Cameratose, My budget is 300.00  So, at this price point can you recommend a better one .  

I have the Zeisss 24-70 ZA but I dont want to carry that around all the time. So I would like a 50mm 1.7-2.8 which is sharp and vibrant colors.  TY I appreciate it.   AF of course

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming then based on your post you want something smaller and lighter. Most of what you're going to find in A-Mount in that price range is going to be a 1.4, which may be larger than you want. If you stick with a screw-drive lens and use the motor in the camera, the lens will be smaller than if you get one with an internal motor.

Check out Dyxum.com, they are the best resource for A-Mount lenses. They have a vast data base that you can search. Lenses are rated by build, sharpness, flare, etc. with an overall ranking of 1-5, and weight and dimensions are provided. You'll probably find something that suits you. Make sure to check the Full Frame choice so you're not looking through APS-C lenses.

Good luck!  

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cameratose said:

I'm assuming then based on your post you want something smaller and lighter. Most of what you're going to find in A-Mount in that price range is going to be a 1.4, which may be larger than you want. If you stick with a screw-drive lens and use the motor in the camera, the lens will be smaller than if you get one with an internal motor.

Check out Dyxum.com, they are the best resource for A-Mount lenses. They have a vast data base that you can search. Lenses are rated by build, sharpness, flare, etc. with an overall ranking of 1-5, and weight and dimensions are provided. You'll probably find something that suits you. Make sure to check the Full Frame choice so you're not looking through APS-C lenses.

Good luck!  

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I don't think any camera guide mentions it, most manufacturers remain mute. It is discussed regularly and typically pointed out during new camera reviews. If Sony were trying to keep it a secret, they wouldn't let their shills say anything. There's no chance of keeping anything like this quiet these days, someone is going to spill the beans. I suspect they, like other manufacturers, don't discuss it in print for some technical reason. I have discussed it with Sony reps at local camera events on several occasions, it's no secret. In fact, they like to tell you about the advantages in practical application.  One thing I noticed in the chart above. The DR chart shows a smaller gain at ISO 400 than the read noise chart. This one is more accurate for noise, and you can see that ISO 400 is actually similar to ISO 126. That's a huge advantage. If you check this chart for your A7 RV you'll see that ISO 320 gets you down to between 126 and 159, seems plenty usable to me. 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      And a different look. The shadow improvement charts show where the shadows are improved for DR, and how much. In the A7 IV there's about a 2-1/2 stop improvement at ISO 400, and then no additional improvement at all until you get to ISO 56K, where Sony applies in-camera NR. According to the primer on this chart, there is no degradation of noise along these flat lines, like from 400 to 51K. Not sure I can agree with that, but I can certainly recover image into ISO 50K in testing and shoot ISO 16-20K successfully.         
    • It is 320 for stills on my A7R5 so it’s 5/3 stops. I have used it on occasions but it’s a bit low to be any huge deal. It is much more use in video where it is 2500. Have a search for any of those terms you mentioned above in any current Sony camera online guide & I doubt you will find anything. I was at an event yesterday where there were two Sony reps & they wouldn’t discuss it even though one of the presenters mentioned it when talking about his A7S3.
    • Yes, I would always wait a week before installing just to see if anyone has problems. This is good advice for any software updates to be honest.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...