Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a Sony 90mm macro lens. At the front end of the lens there's a thin metal ring (similar to a step up/step down ring) that's part of the lens. Somehow it became loose and can fall off. It appears to hold a rubber gasket in place. I'd like to know what the best kind of glue is to attach to the lens. Thank you, MaryAnn

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the filter thread. It should be held in place by screws. You should probably not glue it down because I think it has to be removed if someone needs to get into the lens to repair it.

I don't know where the screws are, but you may be able to find a disassembly guide online. It may even tell you what size the screws are.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, FunWithCameras said:

That's the filter thread. It should be held in place by screws. You should probably not glue it down because I think it has to be removed if someone needs to get into the lens to repair it.

I don't know where the screws are, but you may be able to find a disassembly guide online. It may even tell you what size the screws are.

 

 

38 minutes ago, FunWithCameras said:

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by MaryAnn
wrong place to reply
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I examined the lens just now. It's not the filter thread. That's inside the rim of the lens. See attached for what I'm referring to. There are no screws or screws hole. 

(Apologies - I replied without adding this image to it) (though I do see it above this reply)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by MaryAnn
forgot image
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the filter thread (where the lens cap clips in) is a smaller diameter.

I have looked at my copy of the lens, and the part you have circled appears to be the ring that is the top of the focus ring assembly (this lens has an unusual focus ring that incorporates the AF-MF switch (I think the only other Sony lens I have seen with that design is the 28-135 PZ).

I don't know how that is supposed to be held in place (lens makers love hiding their screws).

I think it might be smart to take it into an offical lens repair shop, mostly for fear that gluing that ring back into place might lead to glue penetrating the lens and gluing something it shouldn't - gluing the focus assembly would be unfortunate, and that  ring is part of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll reach out to a repair shop. Yes, it's in front of the AF-MF part. There are no screws, threads, holes but there are 2 small rectangular pieces embedded on the lens body where the ring seats. Some kind of spongy material. One on each side. Also evidence of some residual glue on the inside lip of the ring. That's what made me think the glue failed. Appreciate assistance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...