Jump to content

100-400 GM OSS giving a vibration while IN VIDEO Mode-DESIGN FLAW??


Recommended Posts

I am having a serious problem with vibration using the Sony 100-400, shooting video, on the FX3 and the A7s3. 

It's an electronic vibration (seen on the LCD), as opposed to something that is happening from wind or physical movement of body and lens.   Please note I've tried using a tripod, a bean bag, the ground, and have have turned the lens OSS OFF, and ON, and changed modes, tried changing focus modes, pulled batteries etc.  I have tried everything that I can think of and read of that is "supposed" to fix the problem.  At one point I thought is was just the FX3, but I tried it with the A7s3 and have the same problem.  It happens with no other lenses.

When the lens is fully extended at 400, and anywhere in range of the lens being fully extended, the vibration is there--and unfortunately, also being recorded on the video.

The only solution I've found so far is to put a bean bag under the extended tube of the lens, and then, at the same time, a smaller bean bag on the top of it.  This kills the vibration, but, the bean bags must be positioned perfectly, so they are putting pressure on the lens tube from the top and bottom.  And this is 100% counterproductive in trying to shoot anything from a video tripod head.

And while I've found a makeshift solution, this prevents me from being able to change lens lengths (try to quickly and quietly take the bean bag off and then reposition -- the wildlife is already gone).  It also prevents me from using manual focus, (which i need sometimes when the tracking through the long lens can't find it's subject) as the focus ring is covered.

I have spoken with a filmmaker friend who uses Sony exclusively, who uses the 200-600 for video.  They have no issues with the 200-600, but, the 200-600 is an internal zoom lens, where the 100-400 has a tube that extends in and out. The thought being, as a top of the line lens, and more expensive than the 200-600, why is this happening??  I'm wondering if the tube extension design is what is flawed, and is what is causing the issue.  As when the tube is 'insulated' by bean bags, the problem goes away.  

I'm wondering if there's anyone else that's experienced this?  While I appreciate all input, i'm really only looking for feedback/advice from those who are actually using the 100-400 lens AT 400mm fully extended, while shooting video.   I've attached the only way the lens works without vibration at 400mm. 

Thanks much!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
    • Hi, I have got a6300 which shutter stopped working. I managed to change shutter but unfortunatelly broke shutter motor tape but I fixed that. After repair the shutter is working but not in a proper way, watch with sound. I bought the second shutter and tried to test it before dissaembling again and it doesn't react to magnet but it works fine when I apply 3V. Are there different type of shutter for a6000 - a6400? Back to the question what is wrong with my shutter after first repair? I don't want to put next shutter unfoundedly. Do your sony cameras perform such a self-check after start up?  IMG_5579 (1).webm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...