Jump to content

Nikon budget zoom choice?


hoakin1981
 Share

Recommended Posts

While considering telephoto prime options for my mirrorless kit I realized that I rarely use high FL such as 150 or 200mm. With this in mind even though primes are superior optically I decided to fill my longish needs with a zoom.

 

At first I was looking into the Nikkor 70-210 f4 AIS since I already have the respective adapter to use it with. However, this choice while good and cheap enough I find it to be quite big and heavy especially for the A6000. In order to use it safely for the body I would have to buy a second adapter with a tripod mount. 

 

On the other hand there is the Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6D which is smaller (I think), much cheaper and most importantly lighter.

 

Optically I cannot be certain which is better especially considering both will be used at around f8.

 

Any suggestions?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While considering telephoto prime options for my mirrorless kit I realized that I rarely use high FL such as 150 or 200mm. With this in mind even though primes are superior optically I decided to fill my longish needs with a zoom.

 

At first I was looking into the Nikkor 70-210 f4 AIS since I already have the respective adapter to use it with. However, this choice while good and cheap enough I find it to be quite big and heavy especially for the A6000. In order to use it safely for the body I would have to buy a second adapter with a tripod mount. 

 

On the other hand there is the Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6D which is smaller (I think), much cheaper and most importantly lighter.

 

Optically I cannot be certain which is better especially considering both will be used at around f8.

 

Any suggestions?

 

Thanks.

 

Sorry, I meant the 80-200 f4 AIS not the Series E one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it right. Get the adapter with the tripod mount.

It's what you should have bought in the first place. 

 

You're not paying $100 just for a tripod foot. Every

aspect of the adapter is better, most notably the

latch on the front flange, and the entire rear flange.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am in an early stage of considering both as well.  Based on the latest info, I kind of leaning toward Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6D since it is more compact. 

 

Love to hear your final decision and experience with the lens you choose.  It will be a while before I will get one since I got a 200mm already and just got a 105mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...