Jump to content

A few Portraits, Open to critique


David Grano-De-Oro
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just a few Head shots. Let me know what you all think.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last image is quite nice, the background is not too distracting. And the one with the statue, are those eyes natural color(?) because that one a little closer, with the three colors of the background, and without the "dog", might be pretty interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last image is quite nice, the background is not too distracting. And the one with the statue, are those eyes natural color(?) because that one a little closer, with the three colors of the background, and without the "dog", might be pretty interesting.

Thanks.

 

No its not her natural eye color, it was a design choice for the colors going on in the back ground. But the last one is her natural eye color. The 4th photo was a mistake in selecting my images as it was shot using my cell phone. But it dose provide a great comparison between a good smart phone head shot vs my pro kit and post work. The dog was intentional is it was a call back for us to our art history classes together at Savannah College of Art, this was in the Vatican museum. 

 

https://500px.com/davidgrano-de-oro

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a portrait it is good when the face is turned toward the light and if the background is blurred and has less brightness, saturation, contrast (or at least two of those three).

 

All pics are very nice, my replies are things, I do also wrong often or there is just not a good angle/situation/light/... to get it better. But you asked for critique and I can learn also some stuff, whenn trying to critique. :)

 

#1 is more about the mood than a portrait. But a wonderful shot.

#2 is well composed, but the colorfull and nice women get lost in the green and bright background.

#3 is a nice portait, but the shot-reverse-shot situation does not work here. Would be better without the person in the front.

#4 :)

#5 good light, but not very well composed. the statue is too present.

#6 is she would stand the other way around (looking to the right), the light would fall on her face and it would be a perfect portrait with the pleasing background.

#7 too much background. I start to think about the house and life style instead of her. Also the position (shooting from above) and the pose are not very charming.

#8 good composition, but her face is in the shadow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a portrait it is good when the face is turned toward the light and if the background is blurred and has less brightness, saturation, contrast (or at least two of those three).

 

All pics are very nice, my replies are things, I do also wrong often or there is just not a good angle/situation/light/... to get it better. But you asked for critique and I can learn also some stuff, whenn trying to critique. :)

 

#1 is more about the mood than a portrait. But a wonderful shot.

#2 is well composed, but the colorfull and nice women get lost in the green and bright background.

#3 is a nice portait, but the shot-reverse-shot situation does not work here. Would be better without the person in the front.

#4 :)

#5 good light, but not very well composed. the statue is too present.

#6 is she would stand the other way around (looking to the right), the light would fall on her face and it would be a perfect portrait with the pleasing background.

#7 too much background. I start to think about the house and life style instead of her. Also the position (shooting from above) and the pose are not very charming.

#8 good composition, but her face is in the shadow.

 

Thanks very much. 

 

Very useful advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will critique the first one, and if you wish I will do others if I can. (My background: 4 years in a portrait studio). Crop off half of the photo above girl. We need to tame the big bush, and get eyes above center horizontal line. Next, put a radial filter around big bush, and decrease exposure, clarity, and possibly contrast. (If you don't have Lightroom, get it). You should now have some pretty good separation between girl and big bush...but we can do better. Next put radial filter around girl and darken everything else even a bit more than looks good. Next increase exposure of entire pix till everything gets as light as you want it...experiment a bit here. You already have great light on face so no adjustment needed there. By now you portrait should be looking kick-ass, since you have done an excellent job of posing girl, and capturing mood too. Even hand posing is excellent. Now you have a keeper that will be cherished for years to come. Nice work.

 

 

markphoto4u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...