Jump to content

Sony A6000 vs a7 III


Recommended Posts

Hello I’m wondering if I should buy the sigma 16mm 1.4 for my a6000, or go all out and invest in the a7 III with the 28-70 kit lens. I want to start doing portraits and events, prints, and would really like an improvement in low light capabilities. Also I don’t exactly need the 4K video, but it would be super nice to have. Should I pull the trigger, invest in the a7 iii? Or will I be able to produce similar quality images with the sigma 16mm f1.4 l, especially in low light? (Night photography, street, dark concert halls)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jaf-Photo

You can do it with A6000. instead of buying A7III and the kitlens (rather bad) you can buy some fast primes. The 16/1.4 is a nice wide lens but you'll also need a longer lens for portraits. The Sigma 30/1.4 or Sony 50/1.8 might get you there.

 

If you're shooting portraits in poor light you'd also do well with a flash like a Nissin or Godox.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...