Jump to content

Can a Sony a7 compete with the Leica Monochrome?


ILCE-7RM2(M)
 Share

Recommended Posts

Given that they both have the same size sensor and MP count, can a converted Sony a7 compete with the pricey Leica Monochrome?

I think that it can, and this is a non-scientific study that I've done to show just that. Please visit my site here to see the results. 

 

https://www.monochromeimaging.com/sample-galleries/sony-vs-leica/

 

All constructive criticisms are welcome.  Thank you, Daniel of Monochrome Imaging Services

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've got a number of the old Monochroms, but they have all been in the shop for many months waiting for the corroded sensor to be replaced. I just got my first Sony Last night...a A7Rii.

 

The sensor on the Sony is pretty impressive. I'm just guessing that the Sony would beat the 18mp Monochrom. The old 18mp Monochrom that I use = about 36mp of a color camera.The Leica's benefit is with a compact footprint, no grip, no prism and easy manual controls and rangefinder.  If you don't need a compact footprint, no grip, no prism and easy manual controls and rangefinder, the Sony is a lot cheaper.

 

I shot both of these with a Monochrom

 

Candid...shot with a Zeiss 21mm

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/selection-from-americans-60-years-after-frank-2016-daniel-d-teoli-jr-mm.jpg

 

Candid...shot wide open with a 35mm 1.4 in terrible light

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/little-dicky-lucky-chops-2016-daniel-d-teoli-jr-m.jpg?w=723

 

I do highest level candid street and social doc photography. I'm also the world leader in infrared flash street photography.

 

Candid Infrared Flash

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/nye-piercing-darkness-infrared-flash-2015-daniel-d-teoli-jr-mr1.jpg

 

Been at it nearly 50 years, so I know a little about what I'm talking about.

 

Candid...shot with a little Fuji X-E1

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/21whoop-whoop-21-daniel-d-teoli-jr-mr.jpg

 

Leica has perfected what is needed in a reporter's cam eons ago. Leica has its problems, but I'm sticking with Leica and supplementing it with the Sony.(I just started to test the Sony at 5 pm last night, so verdict is still out.)  

 

For the price they charge, Leica has not been known for using top grade sensors in their cams other than the Monochrom. But my photos are dependent on many things beside the sensor. Ergonomics are a big deal with me.

 

This is how I roll...

 

http://photohostsnapshots.tumblr.com/image/119353544033

 

That is where the Sony is an issue for me. It is compact enuf, but I don't like the viewfinder on top or the grip. I hate program dials and prefer a real shutter speed dial, as I almost always shoot manual. I only shoot wides, super wides and the occasional normal lens and do lots of zone focus work. If I shot tele,the Sony viewfinder would be great.

 

I am not into landscapes or architecture. But if the occasional sunset or building thumbs their nose at me, I will shoot it. This what the old Monochrom does in decent light and taking your time...hand held.

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/nyc-bohemians-view-2016-daniel-d-teoli-jr-m.jpg

 

You guys and gals want to do museum quality candid street and doc work...pay attention to your cams footprint and ergonomics. They make ALL the difference.

 

Candid

 

https://danielteolijr.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/lost-princess-copyright-2013-daniel-d-teoli-jr-mr.jpg?w=838&h=1295

Link to post
Share on other sites

  Nice images, sir. I'm not sure if you were knocking the Sony or not, but probably not, since you purchased one. I like to carry a converted NEX-7 as my street camera, as it is

quite compact at 24 MP. 

  My comparison of these two cameras is not in their physical similarities, but in their sensors; can the Sony 24 MP Monochrome sensor keep up with the Leica Monochrome

24 MP sensor? I think that many that would like to own the Leica Monochrome, but can't afford it, would buy the converted Sony a7. And the samples shown on my site

attest to this. Are the two sensors identical? No, of course not. Is the Sony Monochrome a viable option? I believe so, and state the reasons why in my article. 

  And the converted Sony a7R II Monochrome does surpass the Leica Monochrome--all be it in a larger footprint. And a Sony is a lot like a Toyota in regards to reliability, in

my opinion. 

 

Thanks for the feedback. Daniel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • Have you used and compared the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with the 2X teleconverter to the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS for birds and other wildlife?  I'm considering the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS (I already have the 2x teleconverter) to replace the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS. I've scoured the web but can't find many helpful direct comparisons.  Application, Environment and Background Info I walk 10-20 kilometres every morning on the southwest coast of British Columbia. It's winter, and in my area that means it's dark and dreary with lots or rain. There are all kinds of birds, from Bald Eagles to Swallows, Hummingbirds and plenty of shorebirds, with many passing through on their migratory paths.  I carry an A1 and FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS and an A7 IV with a FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS or FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II for closer opportunities and landscapes.  I'm happy with the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS when the light is good, but I'm in the middle of six months of this rainy season, so I'm usually shooting at 600 mm, f/6.3, 1/500 sec for stationary subjects, and 1/2000-1/4000 for things on the move. My ISO is often above 6400.  I don't use a tripod or monopod. I'm always on the move. I frequently crop to 200%.  I rarely do videos. I don't shoot sports. The FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS serves me well for large birds like Bald Eagles when the light is good.  Although I'm almost always at the long end (600 mm) of the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS, I use the zoom when a large bird approaches or for distant landscapes. I don't mind the weight of carrying two cameras with these lenses. Things I hope to change or improve Greater agility with a lighter, shorter lens I struggle to move the lens fast enough to catch swallows and other small birds in flight. I do much better with the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II, but I can't fill the frame with that lens.  I can sometimes keep up with those smaller, faster birds, even with the 2x teleconverter, but I still want more reach. Exploring with the 300 mm, fast prime lens I like the idea of expanding my photography as I look for subjects I can capture at 300mm at f/2.8 (people and pet portraits outside, musical acts on stage). Although I have tended to use zoom lenses (FE PZ 16-35 MM F4 G, FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS, FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II), I got the FE 50mm F1.2 GM and have enjoyed having to work with the fixed focal length and how that leads me in different directions. I wonder if I would find the same thing with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS. Depth of Field and Bokeh I'm unsure if the shallow depth of field and bokeh will make a big difference for me. But I may find that these attributes present new opportunities like the FE 50mm F1.2 GM. Here's what I think will happen. I'll use the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS without the teleconverter on dreary days. I have used the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II (sometimes with the 2X teleconverter) for those days. I'll use the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with the 2X teleconverter when there's better light.  Expectations of the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with 2X teleconverter  The focus accuracy and speed with the 2X teleconverter will match or better the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  The image quality will be at least as good as the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  I'm happy with the image quality using the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and 2X teleconverter and can tolerate the slightly slower focus speed. I imagine the results will be similar with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS but at least as good or better than the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS  It will be easier to track small birds in flight with the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS with 2X teleconverter (1675 grams) vs FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (2115 grams). The difference is 340 grams (12 oz) and 5.1 cm in length. That should make a difference, right?  Questions Have you tried both? What are your experiences? Will you keep the FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS? Are my expectations realistic? Thanks for reading and thinking about this with me.
    • One post hit and run.  They must have figured it out. 
    • Other than your disapproval of the stripes.... they're kinda cool. 🫣
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...