Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have an A7RII and am going to try a Milky Way shot but I'm unsure of how to set a feature.  I have to set the hyper-focal distance first which is 2.5m.  The guide I am following suggests using the camera's auto focus system to acquire proper focus and then set manual focusing so it won’t move.

 

I am gong to be taking a series of shots with a remote camera trigger so how do I get around holding the AEL button in?  Is it possible to switch to manual focus after letting auto focus acquire the proper focus?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

`  

   

 

None of the above makes any sense.  

 

But I do know that various remotes differ in function. 

Maybe you should have one that activates AF, plus  

another that only triggers the shutter.

   

Hyperfocal ? 2.5M ? WTF ?  All astro subjects are 

at infinity. No, thaz not a joke. 

   

Nobody needs AF. It's just a convenience. So in any  

circumstances where AF proves inconvenient, kill it. 

If you don't know how, get a MF lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.  I am going for a shot of the Galactic Center, vertical, with landscape in the background.  I plan to stack about five images.  The article first tells me to auto-focus on a marker placed at the hyperfocal distance, then switch to manual focus and do not alter the focus from that point forward.  The idea is to get the greatest depth of field by focusing from the hyperfocal distance to infinity.

 

I just don't understand the concept of going from AF-S to manual focus.  If my subject is in focus when my camera is set at AF-S, will the subject stay in focus when I switch to manual focus?  My lens does not have a manual focus switch.

 

Thanks once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

r042wal,

 

If you want to focus on a set object (hyperlocal distance or otherwise), you can do it in a number of ways:

  • Fully manual focusing
  • AF-S (or any other AF setting)

If you want to use AF (any setting), focus on the object (at whatever distance you're wanting), and then release the shutter button. The focus will now stay there until you initiate focusing again (whether with AF or manual). So now that you've "set" focus at the distance you want, just turn off AF (use C3 or whatever other custom button you may have set), and then shoot as you wish. Focus will not change unless you've "told" the camera to do so, either by AF or manual movement of the focus ring.

 

Works for me… hope it does for you, too.

 

Happy shooting,

 

Bobby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem solved.  The AF/MF centre button is set to 'hold' by default.  Since it is programmable, I set it to 'toggle' instead.  If I AF on a subject and press the AF/MF centre button, the focus locks, even if I press the shutter button down half way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... for a shot of the Galactic Center, vertical, with landscape in the background.  

I plan to stack about five images.  The article first tells me to auto-focus on a

marker placed at the hyperfocal distance, then switch to manual focus and do

not alter the focus from that point forward.  The idea is to get the greatest depth

of field by focusing from the hyperfocal distance to infinity.

 

........

   

Sounds like wrong advice to me. Astro subjects are mostly point source 

or multiple point sources. Please consider that DoF is not really in focus. 

Only the actual plane of focus is in true focus. Point sources demand an 

accurate focus, and are not very suitable for the "almost focus" known

as DoF.

   

OTOH your nighttime landscape tends to silhouette, which DOES work 

out verrrrry well with the "almost focus" of DoF.  

  

IOW, forget hyper focal. Get dead accurate focus on your point sources 

and accept the whatever degree of "almost focus" is rendering all your 

silhouetted foliage, etc. Compomising your point source focus to slightly 

improve edge sharpness of silhouettes is absolutely toadally WRONG. 

  

If this advice comes from some "expert", in the future consider another 

expert, or at least greatly discount advice by your current "expert" :-)   

  

So. Do NOT autofocus. Use your live view MF magnifier, at maximum,  

to focus your point sources and lock/tape/glue/etc your lens to hold at 

that focus. Let the silhouettes render however they may render. They're 

far enuf from the camera to be at "approximate infinity" anywho. There 

is no justification there for using a "hyperfocal" focus setting. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
    • If you're only publishing small-sized photo's or viewing on a phone / computer screen, 12-ish MP should be more than enough for your needs. Since with JPEG, the ability to 'fix' stuff on the computer is very limited anyway, you're not giving up much except the ability to crop/recompose after taking the shot. If you tend to crop often or might print large, shoot fine quality instead as JPEGs don't take up a lot of space anyway. I tend to shoot RAW+JPEG. After a trip/shoot, I download my photos to my computer and quickly scan through my JPEGs to select my keepers. The JPEGs are fine for 90% of my needs but at times there are one or two 'WOW'-shots that I might one day print large. I'll edit the RAW of these photos to my hearts content, generate a JPEG, then delete all RAWs to clear up space.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...