Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

The HVL-60M flash has a video light, but its not enough light for really dark situations.  Its also expensive.

 

I have some Lume cube, but what I really dislike about them is you can only turn them up.  If you want to turn it down you have to cycle through all the way to brightest, then ramp up again from lowest setting.  This ruins the shoot. 

 

I much prefer off camera lighting and flash, but I know this isn't possible in a run/gun type shoot.

 

I'm using a ZF-3000 LED light.  It has a metal foot, and I had to file it slightly to easily fit out shoe.  Its bi-color adjustable(3400K-6000K), and dimable(appx 1500 lumen).  On a F750 battery it'll run an hour and half at full intensity.

 

It was about $70.  

 

JCC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be aware that the shoe plate doesn't fit right on any of these and needs to be trimmed.  

 

With that kind of light I don't usually camera mount it, I prefer to hold it as high as I can in my off hand. 

 

A continuous light also can not give the kind of isolation that a HSS flash can on high shutter speeds.

 

JCC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...