Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, just for kicks I tried my 18-55 and my 35/1.8 DX on the A7r (I recently bought a D3200 only because of the ridiculously low price they were selling it at a supermarket).

 

The 35 covers almost the complete full frame format, only the very extreme corners suffers from bad vignette. But I found it to be always way less sharp than my Minolta MC 35/1.8 with the exception of the exact center of the image full open.

 

The 18-55 covers the full frame between 24 and 55mm, but it is usable only by f/8 onwards (fully open is utter crap, but remember that I tested it on the A7r that supposedly it is quite unforgiven on lenses; I didn't find it to be so bad on the D3200, quite the contrary actually).

 

Anyway they are a real pain to use, because:

 

- the adapter that you have to use to set the aperture does not indicate which aperture you are setting, so you will have to calculate that looking at the difference in shutter times from full open

 

- the focus throw (i.e. how far you have to turn the focusing dial from the nearest focusing distance to infinity) is ultra-short, so focusing on something with any kind of precision is a pain, and I did this from a tripod. Handheld? I would forget about it

 

In my opinion, it is not worth using G lenses unless you already own some very expensive piece of glass. If you want to stick with Nikon, do yourself a favor and buy 2 or 3 manual focus Nikkor lenses. They are quite cheap, the quality will be absolutely great with many of them, and they will be a pleasure to use!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You are so right^

I have 3 nikon f, a 70-200f4 macro zoom, a 28 3.5 and a 50 1.8 and all of them work quite well with the metabones adapter & focus peaking/zoom etc, i tried a mates dx zoom and it was not worth bothering with frankly.

 

BTW, I don't know if you're interested in infrared photography, but for this the 28/3.5 is utterly fantastic. I've used it a few years back with a Nikon D70 DIY converted for narrow infrared, and the images were amazingly tack sharp corner to corner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What exactly do you want to know? I've been steadily selling off all my Nikon glass, but using the G lenses is not a problem at all if you have an adaptor that includes aperture control. That said, changing aperture is not something you can do comfortably with the camera to your eye - you do need to lower it and fiddle around a bit, as it's a very . What I usually would up doing was just preset the aperture I wanted to work at and stick to it. So, for example, I only really use my 50mm f/1.4D for portraits, and I know that my particular copy is best at f/2.2 so that's where I almost always leave it (for portraits).

 

One thing that you do need to be careful with is that due to the location of the ring for selecting between G lenses and non-G lenses, it's very easy to slightly turn it out of position whle handling the camera. If that happens, it's easy to wind up shooting at the wrong aperture, so for example if you've stopped down to f/8 on your non-G lens using the aperture ring but the ring on the adaptor is turned out of place then the lens will actually be at a faster aperture.

 

To be honest, though, I'm getting rid of the Nikkors and other F-mount lenses because the direction of the focus ring is the reverse of most other manufacturers, and it bothers me when switching between the Nikkors and, say, Zeiss lenses. I know Takumars are the same, but I don't have any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking at buying the A7s because of the low light + 4K video possibilities. I do a lot of inside filming and I'm over using artificial light for simple tasks.

 

Basically here in Australia its going to cost $5.5k for the A7s + Atomos Shogun. I love what the shogun can do and cant wait to use it. However I own a Nikon D610 and 6 quality lenses (24-70mm 2.8G, 70-200mm 2.8G, 105mm Micro etc). I dont want to sell them because they are all basically new and are awesome with the D610. But maybe I can sell them all and buy everything back in Canon second hand? I believe Canon has more potential to get 4K right in the future than Nikon. 

 

I'm also looking at buying a Kessler Second shooter setup. 

 

What native A7s E-mount lens is best for AF video? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The shutter is always open on mirrorless. The first or front curtain closing starts the picture taking process, the second or rear curtain completes it. There is no 'shutter slit' That's why your A7 IV has the option to close the shutter on power-down. Shooting electronic shutter is handled 100% by the processor telling the camera when to start saving what the sensor sees and when to stop, in simple terms. I've shot SLR, DSLR, SLT, and mirrorless, and mirrorless is by far the best. I shoot film from time to time and still have a couple of old DSLRS, a Minolta Maxxum 5D and a Sony A350. I have gotten to seriously dislike optical viewfinders. I would never shoot SLT again. It may have been the predecessor to mirrorless, but it wasn't great technology.  The AF issue aside, I think you just need to spend more time with the mirrorless. I know a few guys who went back to DSLR for similar reasons, but they eventually ended up back in mirrorless. Since DSLR is going the way of the dinosaur, your options aren't many. Shoot older cameras or mirrorless.   
    • Maybe could help but I doubt that the camera will drive the lenses better. from fw 3.2 the AF was spectacular even with the Minolta 80-200, not even close to a77ii but i was expecting it to be quite lackluster. It was snappy and tracked cars moving at 30kmh towards me without an issue. It was when I updated to 4.0 when I felt like i had to get the Sigma lens, which offers roughly the same experience: good autofocus on slow objects, stays in place or back focused (especially back focusing) most of the shots. I've tried to see if you can downgrade the firmware, but I've seen negative results. ISO1250 and that's overexposed, iso800 and the detail remains. could be, since it's no SLT either you also need the shutter slit to be wide enough to let the sensor do autofocus. all in all I believe mirrorless cameras are a step back from dslr and SLT cameras The SLT A99II has proven to be the best autofocusing camera in the world and it still is, it's just that the gimmick of the mirrorless cameras can detect the eye of the subject and promise to obtain better action portraits because they focus on the eye or cockpit of the subject. Because of this I was going to go full onto the A7CII but when I read it can only do 1/4000 and has a single shutter curtain I really felt like that was two fundamental deal breakers. The lack of joystick also made me quack off but the A7IV joystick isn't joyful either, all in all I have realized that going from the A77II to the a7iv had just a single point for which was clear photos at iso 3200, because everything else is a serious downgrade: the battery life, the ergonomics, the button layout, the autofocus responsiveness, the shutter cycle duration (3ms for A77II and 5ms for A7IV) etc. I wanted an A99II (thus paying only half of what I had to pay to convert to E mount) but all the ones I've seen were outside the EU or in poor condition.
    • Man, that stinks. I still wouldn't give up on settings though. Have you tried doing a factory reset and starting from scratch? What about all of the firmware updates on the camera?  One other thing, you say you're shooting f/4 and 1/5000. That's pretty quick. What kind of ISO does that result in? These cameras need light to AF so they can see contrasts. Have you tried dropping the shutter to 1/2000, or even 1/1600? You'll gain a couple stops of light to the sensor. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...