Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Since I got an LA-EA3 I'm all buzzed about auto-iris.

It's like it's the early 1960s and I just got a then-new

camera ! Auto-iris ... Whoooo-hoot ! I still use my old

Nikkors on a Metabones non-coupled adapter where  

I don't need auto-iris, but the automatic is such a kick. 

  

Here's the hardware:  

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  

   

Here's a shot at the near limit. Unfortunately, the

tiny file size allowed here is especially destructive

to this shot ... so I added a crop section at maybe

barely enuf improved rezo for getting the "feel" of

the subject and lighting. 

  

Crop Section:

 

  

   

 

  

The whole view  ... you'll just hafta  imagine the proper

texture. If you view this closely, it will fall apart before

you ever see the texture thaz shown in the crop above :-(

  

   

  

Sooo ... why did I even bother to post a pic thaz almost

toadally fuggdup by the file size limit ? Well, cuz it's the

type of shot that overcomes my reluctance to use zoom

lenses. It's window light and constantly moving. Trying

to keep the shot together while chasing it with a tripod

is just too frustrating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are examples of why I unmothballed this lens.

This scene is about 2 miles from home, but I hafta

do almost the same thing for hire, in Manhattan, so

this is a great dry run. Same horrible lighting, too !

IIRC this is about ISO 8000 f/3.5 @1/60.

 

One unanticipated, intangible, very important, not  

to be ignored discovery of this dry run concerns

the ergonomics of this lens. It feels comfortable

and well balanced, smooth and easy to operate ...

BUT ! Being an AF lens that I'm using only in MF,

the focus ring has so little resistance that about 70

to 80% of the test shots were focused somewhat

beyond the intended subject :-( It seems no matter

how carefully I focus, as I remove my finger from

the focus ring I tend to shift the ring just a tiny bit,

toward more distant focus. Important thing to have

become aware of, since I'm so accustomed to my

trustworthy well-behaved ancient Nikkors ! 

  

So here's a couple examples of how looks when

I don't fuggup the focus:

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  

  

  

    

It's not fully wide open, but it still helps direct the

eye to the chosen player even tho they are not at

grossly different distances. And the background is

still providing recognizable context without being

a major distraction. I love that. Now all I gotta do

is practice letting go of the focus ring without my

nudging it toward more distant focus ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...