Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You only have one year warranty, so it's important to see if it was registered by previous owner and date of purchase. Beyond that, you may just want to contact Sony. I have never had issues with any of my Sony cameras, someone else may know more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFIK, warranty only extends to the original purchaser in 99% of purchases. You do not say if you are buying new in box or new to you? what is important if secondhand and still in warranty is a copy of the original sales slip and the address of the original person who registered it. that gives you the means to ask for warranty as you have "moved" to your address.

 

if you are buying new from ebay I would ask Sony directly if the seller is recognised and will warranty be offered by Sony.

 

There are plenty of instances both good and bad where warranty was' and was not, honoured by ebay and on line sellers of new equipment. 

 

you could also take out Ebay warranty as well its good value for money I think 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good advise above. I think a short answer that is pretty helpful is that a warrantee is only as good as the receipt. Always ask the seller for the original receipt like on nearly new or mint camera. You may not get one, but if you don't ask you surely won't get one. Also remember that there are many good technicians out there that can fix many problems -- of course you have to look around and check them out for sure... Good luck.

 

 

markphoto4u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...