Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I’ve been using a Sony A600 for more than a year and I would like the possibility of taking time-lapse. A saw two options:

- The playmemories app for $10

- Getting a multi-port to 2.5mm converter and then any intervalometer, total around $20



 

Does anyone tried both? Do you now advantages and disadvantages of each method?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to use an external intervalometer but nowadays I use the app.

This offers me two possibilities. 

  • In lazy mode I can have the camera make a movie.
  • When not in lazy mode, I can use the pics to make a 4k timelapse using panolapse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xphUvKlKW3I  4k timelapse "handmade"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tw-IFisYCA also 4k handmade

 

This one is straight out of the camera

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QslAF84ex4w

 

This one was edited with music but the videos were as they came out of the camera

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ6kMH_Jrmk

Link to post
Share on other sites

The app works pretty well for me.

Although time consuming I set it to shoot raw files, have fun with them in Lightroom, apply to all images, export JPGs in whatever resolution my video-editing friend wants.

 

My only major complaints at the moments are... That the screen doesen´t really turn off (backlight eats battery time) and the frustration of setting all exposure settings again within the app. Only to find that a specific setting like low/high limit for auto-ISO need to be set before starting the app.

In other words, first-world problems. :)

 

/Allan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...