Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, currently I have an A72. Relative to the A72, would Leica M lenses perform better on either the A7S/A7S2 or the A7R2? I'm particularly thinking of the 35 summilux ASPH FLE and the 50 summilux ASPH.

 

Thanks in advance for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those wider rangefinder lenses all seem to have trouble with silicon based photography, if you follow the discussions.

 

A 35mm might still be OK on the A7R II, since it doesn't have an AA filter, so the filter stack is thinner. The A7S II has the thicker stack, but OTOH it's resolving less and doesn't challenge the lenses as much. But any symmetrical construction under 35 is not really cutting it on digital (the WATE seems to be an exception, but it's zoom and not symmetrical). Owners of classical rangefinder glass – like Leica-M or Zeiss Biogons – had high hopes for the A7R II in particular, but got quite disappointed by anything from 28mm or wider.

 

Sony (together with Zeiss) is obviously doing something quite right with their native lenses if you look up all the discussions about adapting some of the wider rangefinder glass from Leica or Voigtländer. Those symmetrical Biogon lenses were great (albeit very expensive) for film, but have massive problems on chips, some even on Leica's own.

OTOH, classical retrofocus constructions are not that great either, as those of us know who are not only using their center part, but full frame. The 25mm Contax C/Y which I owned for my GH2 had to go after I got me an A7S and it showed such bad corners. Their new Batis seems to outclass it by far. The only wide I kept was the 18mm, but that one is slow (never wanted to hunt down a 21mm considering price and weight).

It's obviously an advantage that Zeiss has been making both retrofocus (like C/Y) and symmetrical (think Contax G) wides for decades. If you look at Sonys native FE primes, theres not a single one that disappoints and the prices are quite fair! The 55mm for example (which I had for a test) is so close to an Otus, but for a fraction of the price. Canikon, watch out!

If you like vintage glass as much as I do, go for retrofocus wides. I still own the Contax C/Y 18mm f4, a Minolta SR 21mm f2.8 and both Oly 21mm f3.5 and 24mm f2.8. But don't expect performance like the Sony FE 28mm f2.0 or the Zeiss Batis line wide open without stopping the old ones down to f8!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My A7s modified by Kolari Vision works fine with both 50/1.4 asph and 35/1.4 FLE lenses. Corners are rather soft at f/1.4 on the 35/1.4 FLE though but they don't look signicantly sharper on the M240 to be honest. Here A7s mod with 35/1.4 FLE at about 0.5 metre, f/1.4, focus on "Castelot". FWIW.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm not sure about previous A7's before the A7Rii, but the 35mm summicron and longer focal lengths are fine with my A7rii.  I haven't tried the batis line yet but hear good things about them.  Perhaps I'll have to get one if I ever decide to do autofocus again in the future.  i"m too use to manual focus for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

100% agree with the comment regarding Sony's 55 1.8 and 28 2.0; stunning wide open.  Still I'm very happy with Leica 35 summilux ASPH, 50 summicron, 75 summarit and 90 cron, all seem to perform well using helicord adapters that reduce MFD to about half of standard adapters.

 

I purchased a new Zeiss Distagon 35mm f1.4 ZM about a month ago and will test it against the 35 lux and will keep what I think is the winner. I'll try to post some test results here after I'm done.

 

Regarding jmr's post, I can only comment on my use with the A7R-ll and A7R and I'm pleased with what i seem thus far.  I'd like to see how the 24 Summilux performs on the A7R-ll but that's a budget buster at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hi there, I just got a Sony 6700 and I absolutely love it. However, I noticed that transfer speeds into lightroom were very slow. I decided to run a benchmark by transferring files from the camera in MSC mode and I could only ever get to 150mb/s. I am using a USB 40gb/s cable in a 20gb/s USB C port.  To investigated further, I decided to run a benchmark using crystaldiskmark of the camera in MSC mode and found I could only reach 175mb/s read and 60mb/s write. My SD card is a Kingston 128gb V90. I also tried a Lexar 128gb v60 and got the same speeds. Anybody with a 6700 willing to test their transfer speeds in windows through a file transfer or crystaldiskmark to help curb my anxiety that something is wrong with my unit? Thank you!
    • I find that gear is very particular to the user. I have both the A7Cii and A7CR and love to use them with the 24 f2.5 and 40 F2.8 due to the size however due to the choice to shoot a range of genres I have larger lenses which remove the benefit of the small bodies. My advice is to buy something to cover what you do the most and the lens you want to use the most. There are always so many variables at play and often there simply is no right answer. Whatever you decide, I hope you enjoy it.
    • It's entirely up to the individual. Personally I have opted this time round for the 24mm f2.8 and 40 mm f2.5 compact lenses due to their size, build quality and performance mix rather than a zoom up to 70mm. At 70mm and beyond I have the 85mm f1.8, 70-200 ii f2.8 and 100-400 supporting the A7Cii and A7CR. Every genre and every day can bring different challenges however I generally tend to use the 40mm in urban environments more than the 24mm. For travel I will often take the 24, 40 and 70-200 but only carry what I need on the day. Sorry I can't be any more helpful as it can vary wildly due to the number of variables and there simply isn't a correct answer. Whatever you decide, it's great gear and you will make it work. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...