Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

among the restrictions of the Canon EF lens adapter for Sony E-mount cameras, Metabones lists "Direct Manual Focus mode (DMF) not supported". When I sent them an email, the reply was they had no intention of implementing that feature.

 

Since I don't have an alpha yet, I'm a bit confused what DMF actually is and what that restriction means.

What I'd want from the camera is what Canon calls "Full Time Manual" (FTM), which is a feature of their "genuine-USM" powered lenses. It means that you can manually focus at any time, regardless of the setting of the AF switch on the lens.

 

I find this feature critical. If you combine it with a configuration where a shutter half-press does no longer start the autofocusing but you have a separate button for the AF start, this the lets you focus manually but press the AF button whenever you feel like it. You'll never have an annoying accidental re-focus occur when all you wanted was measure exposure.

 

I would be very glad if any Sony/Metabones users could confirm if that works with Canon EF lenses on the adapter or not.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That should work. The Canon FTM is not actually

a "built-in" or "additional" feature. Whenever you

use FTM while in AF mode, you are just "forcing"

the focusing mechanism. The Metabones adapter

doesn't need to know you are doing that, and it

has no way of knowing it either. Suppose you put

your eyeglasses over the front lens element, which

would refocus the image .... the Metabones again

won't know, can't know, and doesn't need to know.

 

You can also force some non-ultrasonic lenses in

the same manner. The important difference is that

after you do this a few times to the non-USM lens

you may have damaged it. The USM drive lacks

a solid mechanical coupling. So, when you force it

you're not really "forcing" a gear train or any other

moving part. The "mechanical coupling" of a USM

is not a gear train or such. The coupling medium

is simply air. And when that air is not activated into

sonic waves, the focus ceases rotating. But it's OK

to rotate it manually. You won't damage the air.

 

The Alpha "DMF" relies on Sony's system where

the focus ring is NOT mechanically coupled but

is simply a data wheel ["fly by wire focus"]. I don't

see why Metabones even mentions "DMF" when

describing functionality of adapted Canon lenses.

 

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...