Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m struggling to get consistently focused shots of my dog running at me. My setup can handle the fastest flying birds coming in from all different directions, it should be able to handle this scenario, so I’m not sure what’s going on.

My setup and settings:

- Sony A7IV with Sony FE 2.8/70-200 GM OSS
- Manual (“M”) shooting mode
- AF-C
- 1/4000 - 1/5000 (she’s fast :))
- F4.5
- ISO Auto
- Face/Eye Subject set to Animal
- Face/Eye Priority in AF On
- AF Tracking Sensitivity 3 (Balanced) - I’ve also tried 1 (Locked), no apparent difference 
- Focus areas - I’ve tried Wide, Zone, Large Spot, Expanded Spot; Large spot seems to yield best results, IF it locks on
- Lens switch settings - AF, Full, OSS On, Mode 1. I’ve been using Mode 2 for years (for birds), but decided to switch to 1 last week because I’m really not panning side to side. 
- Lens barrel side button set to AF On + Tracking On
- Center dial button on A7IV set to AF On (Back Button Focus)

The process:

I put my dog in a sit and walk away from her maybe 20-30 yard. With the dog staring at me, I first use BBF to establish focus (big green box on face or little green box on eye), then release BBF button and depress lens barrel side button which is set to AF On + Tracking On. With the lens barrel button depressed and the green box still visible in A7IV screen on dogs head or face, I call her and start shooting. I generally do not see the box following the dog as I’m shooting but she’s quick and I’m focused no pun intended on keeping her in the frame and taking shots. 

The results:

Most of my shots are way out of focus, or focused all over the place but not anywhere on the dog. I have the Focus Frame Display turned on and it’s showing little and bigger green focus point boxes all over the place but usually not on the dog and almost never near its head or face where I thought I established focus. Tbh it seems like the shots are often not in focus where the Focus Frame Display says they are, but I’m making that judgement looking at shots on camera. I have a way of looking at larger shots on computer with focus spot identifiers but that’s not the point here.

The bottom line: 

I’m not getting consistently focused shots in what I’m thinking is a relatively simply albeit action oriented shooting situation. Something in my setup is wrong, or it’s user error, or both. 

My guesses:

- One or more settings are wrong or are conflicting with one another
- Something is getting messed up in the hand off from BBF (AF On) to AF On + Tracking On on the lens barrel, maybe I shouldn’t be using both one after another, again, user error, my settings, or both.
- Tracking is not staying locked on, again, something in the way I’m engaging or mistakingly disengaging it, ir there’s an actual issue with my camera or lens. Doubtful but possible.
- Maybe shooting a dog running at me versus side to side like a flying bird is not a simple shot after all🙂 

The attached is a straight transfer from camera to iPhone so I could share for illustrative purposes. Aside from making it brighter, I haven’t processed it yet. Just an example of what I’m trying to shoot. This was one decent shot out of maybe 50 lesser ones.

Any thoughts or suggestions? Thank you in advance.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So many variables.

One thing of note, almost every lens manufacturer recommends turning stabilization off above 1/1600-2000. You simply don't need it with higher shutter speeds, and the camera could misinterpret your movement as something that needs to be corrected. 

It sounds like you know what you're doing, so if you can follow the dog without tracking, then turn tracking off. 

Turn off all the fancy focus crap and try the shutter button half-press. Why make it so complicated?

I shoot racing, 200-300mph, Manual, never use a shutter speed above 1600. Med spot, shutter button half-press, tracking off, AF-C, sensitivity to 1. When the A7 IV was my main camera, I used a Minolta A-Mount 80-200 2/.8 HS AF G. Shooting a burst of 20 or so, I would typically get one or two out of focus and the rest were good. Usually, it was when the car passed something like the Christmas Tree and it tried to focus on that instead. On your OOF shots, is there anything in the frame that's in focus? Something the camera is trying to focus on?

I would simplify the setup and try again. If you think you have some conflicting settings that you can't identify, you could try a factory reset and start over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...