Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hola, es una lente que me interesa para mi Sony A7III (PAISAJES)

El recién anunciado Sony 16 mm f/1.8 G ofrece una calidad de imagen de alta resolución, un bokeh suave, un autoenfoque preciso y una brillante apertura de F1.8, lo que lo hace ideal para una variedad de escenarios de fotografía y vídeo, como paisajes, astrofotografía y más. Nate Luebbe y Autumn Schrock, miembros de Alpha Collective, llevaron el nuevo 16 mm f/1.8 G a las islas Lofoten, en el norte de Noruega, donde tuvieron la fortuna de fotografiar desde paisajes al amanecer y al atardecer hasta la deslumbrante aurora boreal. Vea sus imágenes a continuación y lea lo que opinan sobre el rendimiento del nuevo objetivo. Descubra más sobre el Sony 16 mm f/1.8 G AQUÍ .

Sony f/1.8 a las perf

Edited by felipe
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...