Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Try it and you'll know it. Acceptability of image quality is very subjective. It's a tradeoff between ISO noise, motion blur, flash lighting and/or just accepting that you can't take the shot given the circumstances.

That being said, personally I'd try to stay below 6400 and just accept to not take the shot if that's insufficient. But then again, I'm just a hobbyist so not taking the shot is a viable option for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated, it's subjective. However, a good AI de-noising program can make a huge difference. I shoot at ISO 20,000 quite a bit when I have to get the shot, and use DXO to clean them up. I wouldn't be able to do that without DXO, even using a standard method of denoise in a software program. It's probably the best money you can spend after your processing software.

On my cameras I don't need to denoise from ISO 3200 and below under normal circumstances. I don't know how the A7 responds. 

Lastly, bear in mind noise has much to do with the original exposure. Over-exposing and pulling it back in post can make a positive difference. You may see this written as ETTR, or "Expose To The Right", which means to push the meter in the viewfinder to the + (or right) side.  

As Pieter said, some of these things are best done by trial and error. One man's set up may not be the same as the next. Do some testing in low light and see what works best for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the things I have read about A7 and A7II, indicated neither of theses models were any good at low light situation.  And all of the reviews I have read about A7III said it was significantly better than it's predecessors in high ISO photography.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
    • I'm pretty confident OP made up his mind in the past 14 months.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...