Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I shoot video on the A7siii and love is low-light abilities. However I’m finding it’s 12 mp sensor very limited for photography (really missing the crop-in and reframing options).  I also have an A7iii but never carry both together, so can shoot only video or photos, depending on the day. 
If I were to sell both and replace them with one body, what, if anything, are the realistic options in the Sony ecosphere for a single camera with (low-light) impressive video and (better than 12 mp resolution) photos?

many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/29/2024 at 10:47 PM, patb said:

I shoot video on the A7siii and love is low-light abilities. However I’m finding it’s 12 mp sensor very limited for photography (really missing the crop-in and reframing options).  I also have an A7iii but never carry both together, so can shoot only video or photos, depending on the day. 
If I were to sell both and replace them with one body, what, if anything, are the realistic options in the Sony ecosphere for a single camera with (low-light) impressive video and (better than 12 mp resolution) photos?

many thanks!

Hi!

ZV-E1, A7S3, FX3, FX6 are the best options for low light video. And the closest thing in the 2K$-3K$ price range is the A7M4. Video capabilities are worse than the A7S3, but at 25 fps still impressive. Photo performance is better than the A7M3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Some questions to help you formulate the answer to your own question: In what sense do you feel your 70-350 is lacking? What do you hope to gain from this 'upgrade'? What % of your shots are in the 70-200 range? If this % is significant, the 200-600 is not an option unless you carry two cameras or don't mind lens swapping. What % of your shots is at 350mm and potentially could have benefitted from more reach? Do you need high resolution shots or is cropping in post an option to fix your compositions? Would carrying a lens over twice as big and over 3 times as heavy have a negative impact on your photography (think of fun, mobility, physical strain, packing volume)?
    • Im looking to upgrade my Lens for high school football games, I currently have the Sony - E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS Telephoto Zoom Lens for E-mount.   I am comparing the Sony e70-350 telephoto zoom lense to Sony 200mm-600mm G OSS.   Help and suggestions please!
    • I don't think any camera guide mentions it, most manufacturers remain mute. It is discussed regularly and typically pointed out during new camera reviews. If Sony were trying to keep it a secret, they wouldn't let their shills say anything. There's no chance of keeping anything like this quiet these days, someone is going to spill the beans. I suspect they, like other manufacturers, don't discuss it in print for some technical reason. I have discussed it with Sony reps at local camera events on several occasions, it's no secret. In fact, they like to tell you about the advantages in practical application.  One thing I noticed in the chart above. The DR chart shows a smaller gain at ISO 400 than the read noise chart. This one is more accurate for noise, and you can see that ISO 400 is actually similar to ISO 126. That's a huge advantage. If you check this chart for your A7 RV you'll see that ISO 320 gets you down to between 126 and 159, seems plenty usable to me. 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      And a different look. The shadow improvement charts show where the shadows are improved for DR, and how much. In the A7 IV there's about a 2-1/2 stop improvement at ISO 400, and then no additional improvement at all until you get to ISO 56K, where Sony applies in-camera NR. According to the primer on this chart, there is no degradation of noise along these flat lines, like from 400 to 51K. Not sure I can agree with that, but I can certainly recover image into ISO 50K in testing and shoot ISO 16-20K successfully.         
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...