Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been having some AF issues recently that comes up randomly but not often.  The camera sometimes struggles to focus on what seems to be a pretty easy subject to focus on and starts “focus breathing” (Not sure if this is the correct term) really fast and the camera is unable to focus on the subject.  Sometimes, when shooting a person, the camera shows the square box over the subjects face to show it is recognizing a human and turns green but the subject isn’t in focus and the AF just starts breathing really fast again. I have tried on my different lenses and the issue still persists.  In the video I believe I had my Tamron 28-75 lens on and from my googling the minimum focus distance is 7”, my camera was about 2 feet away from the subject.  Has anyone had this issue before?  This issue doesn’t come up that often but when it does it’s really annoying because it takes a while for me to focus on what  I need to.  
 

 

 

AF issues example

Example 2

 

 

edit:added another example

Edited by Peteryunsie
Link to post
Share on other sites

First one seems to be related to minimum focus distance. The minimum focus distance of 7" is only at 28mm focal length. At longer focal lengths, the minimum focus distance increases. You seem to be zoomed in and pretty close to the subject.

Second one unclear. The subject moves a lot and face moves out of the frame, could give some struggles to the camera.

Does the problem also occur on stationary subjects further away?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2023 at 6:15 AM, Pieter said:

First one seems to be related to minimum focus distance. The minimum focus distance of 7" is only at 28mm focal length. At longer focal lengths, the minimum focus distance increases. You seem to be zoomed in and pretty close to the subject.

Second one unclear. The subject moves a lot and face moves out of the frame, could give some struggles to the camera.

Does the problem also occur on stationary subjects further away?

Yeah the first one wasn't at 28mm, don't remember what it was at, so I guess  that could've been the issue.

Second example:  Could be, but just weird how it'd glow green to say it was in focus when it wasn't in focus, that night I was trying for a while for the camera to focus on any of my friends and it was struggling even if they weren't moving much.  

Can't remember if it happens on stationery objects or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello Peteryunsie! 
I encounter the same problem (first example with a focus breathing which should not happen) while filming. 
Did you find a solution? Do you know where it comes from?
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Lauren

Edited by Lauren-
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lauren- said:

Hello Peteryunsie! 
I encounter the same problem (first example with a focus breathing which should not happen) while filming. 
Did you find a solution? Do you know where it comes from?
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Lauren

Lauren, that user hasn't been here for almost two years. In answer to your question, the description of what he calls 'focus breathing' sounds more like 'hunting', where the camera can't find focus so it 'hunts' back and forth. There can be a couple of reasons for this, Pieter describes one above. Another can be too low of a light source. These cameras need enough light to see the subject, and enough contrast to find focus. Depending on the camera, that amount of light varies. The A7 IV, for example, is rated better in low light AF than some of the earlier models.  

In order to stop the camera from making a shot when out of focus, go into the menu and turn on 'release on focus' so it only makes the shot when in focus. If you leave the release on 'balanced' it will sometimes take a shot even if not in focus. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
    • If you're only publishing small-sized photo's or viewing on a phone / computer screen, 12-ish MP should be more than enough for your needs. Since with JPEG, the ability to 'fix' stuff on the computer is very limited anyway, you're not giving up much except the ability to crop/recompose after taking the shot. If you tend to crop often or might print large, shoot fine quality instead as JPEGs don't take up a lot of space anyway. I tend to shoot RAW+JPEG. After a trip/shoot, I download my photos to my computer and quickly scan through my JPEGs to select my keepers. The JPEGs are fine for 90% of my needs but at times there are one or two 'WOW'-shots that I might one day print large. I'll edit the RAW of these photos to my hearts content, generate a JPEG, then delete all RAWs to clear up space.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...