Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have tested the following Canon lenses w/ A7RII + Metabones IV…

 

AF Works:
Canon 17-40mm f/4.0L USM
Canon 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II
Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM
Canon 40mm f/2.8 Pancake
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II + Canon 2X TCIII (tad slower)
Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro

 

AF Buggy:
Canon 135mm f/2.0L USM
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II + Sigma 2x TC

 

Of the above combos the two best are the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II or the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II. Neither of these hunt and I would say they focus as quickly if not quicker than on my 5DIII. I was bummed that my 135L couldn’t achieve focus but I haven’t tested in outside lighting conditions (the above tests were just in around my office using LED recessed lighting).

 

I will be doing some more tests before consolidating the above gear (holding on to the 24-70 & 70-200 for a bit) in better outside lighting conditions. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ludwig!   You seem to have almost the same bag that I do.  I just haven't got my hands on a Metabones yet.  Definite bummer about the 135L.  I'm also guessing that my beloved 85Lii might not fare to well

Really hoping that if I take my 135L in outside conditions it will fare better but I'm not betting on it. I don't want to bail on my collection of glass but I don't want to keep dead weight if it's no longer being used. I'm currently looking at the following:

 

FE 16-35OSS

FE 55 1.8

Batis 85

 

I'm already spending a small fortune switching over and would prefer not to loose my butt too much but if I can finagle the Batis 25 in there also I think w/ the exception of my favorite zooms (24-70 & 70-200) I should be golden.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll vouch for the 55 1.8.  That was the only lens I bought with the R2, and used it exclusively since last Wednesday.  Amazing little piece of glass.  There's some color fringing wide open, but that's easily fixed.  Some shots I got over the last few days with it:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/bpaulette/sets/72157656511722568

 

I just returned it, in exchange for the 90mm Macro G, but only because I have a headshot session this weekend, and want to pit the A7Rii / 90G against my 5D3 / 100L in the studio.  If the 90 holds it's own, I may sell my trusty Canon 100L and buy back the 55 1.8 (I know I'll buy it back one way or the other, fantastic lens)

 

I'm also eyeballing that Batis, but they seem a little hard to come by at the moment.  (Also the rumors of a Sony 85mm f/1.4 G have me intrigued)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll vouch for the 55 1.8.  That was the only lens I bought with the R2, and used it exclusively since last Wednesday.  Amazing little piece of glass.  There's some color fringing wide open, but that's easily fixed.  Some shots I got over the last few days with it:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/bpaulette/sets/72157656511722568

 

I just returned it, in exchange for the 90mm Macro G, but only because I have a headshot session this weekend, and want to pit the A7Rii / 90G against my 5D3 / 100L in the studio.  If the 90 holds it's own, I may sell my trusty Canon 100L and buy back the 55 1.8 (I know I'll buy it back one way or the other, fantastic lens)

 

I'm also eyeballing that Batis, but they seem a little hard to come by at the moment.  (Also the rumors of a Sony 85mm f/1.4 G have me intrigued)

 

I keep on hoping I will find a Batis but as you mentioned they are hard to be found. Currently the only E-Mount Lens I have is the Loxia 2/35 and LOVE it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The 200-600 is heavy. If you're not used to the weight, it can be daunting over a period of time. Since the lenses are the same in speed, you aren't gaining any low-light performance. But as Pieter suggests, what about the short end? Is 200 going to be a problem? Are you shooting from the sidelines or from the stands? If after reviewing your most commonly used focal length you find 200 won't do it, then you could look at the Sigma 60-600 Sport. It's about the same price as the Sony and would give you more at the wide end but is a bit heavier yet.  Two other options would be the Sigma 150-600 and the Tamron 150-500. Both are similar in weight to the others, maybe a touch lighter.   Lastly, and if reach is your problem, then this may not work, you could look at the Tamron 50-400. It's an amazing lens, sharp from end to end, considerably smaller and lighter than the others, and costs less. I use it all the time, thousands of shots, and it never disappoints. But 400 may not be long enough for you.  FWIW, I have the 200-600. It gets taken out about 3 times a year, while the 50-400 goes with me every time. If you go with one of the larger lenses, plan on using a monopod just to help with supporting it for a few hours.     
    • Some questions to help you formulate the answer to your own question: In what sense do you feel your 70-350 is lacking? What do you hope to gain from this 'upgrade'? What % of your shots are in the 70-200 range? If this % is significant, the 200-600 is not an option unless you carry two cameras or don't mind lens swapping. What % of your shots is at 350mm and potentially could have benefitted from more reach? Do you need high resolution shots or is cropping in post an option to fix your compositions? Would carrying a lens over twice as big and over 3 times as heavy have a negative impact on your photography (think of fun, mobility, physical strain, packing volume)?
    • Im looking to upgrade my Lens for high school football games, I currently have the Sony - E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS Telephoto Zoom Lens for E-mount.   I am comparing the Sony e70-350 telephoto zoom lense to Sony 200mm-600mm G OSS.   Help and suggestions please!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...