Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,
i am looking forward to buy a Sony a7iii, in Bangalore, India. i found the authorized shops from the Sony website, and went to the stores, 
their was difference in the price between every shop and one particular shop was ready to sell the Sony A7iii body for 1,30,000 rs /-,
and this shop was listed in the Sony Authorized dealers
Iam so confused is it the original product or a grey market product,
Can any one help me with the camera serial numbers for India, or 
How to identify the camera is original or a grey market or Counterfeit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a world of difference between grey and counterfeit. I would liken grey to buying used and out of warranty. If the saving is sufficient, and the seller is reputable, that is possible route.

Of course, I don't know how much Sony kit you have bought up to now. Over the past three years, I think I'm at maybe four items, cameras and lenses --- but nothing anywhere near to 1.3 Lakh. Anyway, everything has come with a proper company tax invoice, of course, and a yellow A4 "Sony India pvt" warrantee sheet. If you have that, and the company is listed by Sony, I don't think you can go wrong for warranty claims.

I've bought from J J Mehta via Amazon, Fotocentre, via their own site, and  Videolinks. The latter do not list these items on their site, but you can get a price and buy by email. I wish I was nearer: Chennai to Kerala is too far for a shopping trip, otherwise I would visit their shop. 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thad E Ginathom said:

There's a world of difference between grey and counterfeit. I would liken grey to buying used and out of warranty.

I'm sorry to disagree, with all due respect:

To my knowledge, a "grey" article is an original, brand-new article which is made available in one country through bypassing of the dedicated sales channels of the manufacturer, which he has set up for that country.

Example: Switzerland is considered a country where its citizens are deemed to have a high purchasing power. Manufacturers are always trying to make a maximum profit, so they take advantage of the assumed difference in purchasing powers between different countries. That's why brand-articles (like a Sony camera) tend to be more expensive in Switzerland. India, by comparison, is probably considered a lower-wage country. That's why the same brand article is offered cheaper in India than in Switzerland, because otherwise people in India wouldn't afford high-end products at all.

That said: provided you get the certificate of originality/warranty upon buying in India, you may get a cheaper acquisition of an original brand item, compared to buying in your home country. But you will most definitely run into costly problems, if you need to have the product repaired back in your home country, should the need arise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Chrissie said:

I'm sorry to disagree,

I don't think we disagree at all, but I do think that I worded the last post badly.

 

22 hours ago, Thad E Ginathom said:

I would liken grey to buying used and out of warranty

A grey item is exactly what you say. It should be brand new, but will have come from a different market, from which it is able to be sold at a lower price than the same item sourced from the local market. This means it probably will not be supported by the local manufacturer channels.

A risky proposition. Is the risk worth it? The answer is down to the amount saved, and how the individual feels about the risk.

When faced with this choice, a decade or so ago, the camera was new, grey-market, and sold as "shop warranty only." My way of evaluating the risk was to say, I would pay this price for the camera used, with no warranty, so I will accept this deal. 

The camera in question was a Canon P&S; not that expensive, but not cheap either. Whilst it broke down, it outlived the warranty by several years. My decision was ok!

Liken was probably the wrong word: it was meant to communicate the subjective experience. It didn't do that.

Personally, now, I might again go for a grey deal on $$$, but probably not on $,$$$. Added to which, I have the impression that Sony is ruthless about this sort of thing.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Camera should be set to forced flash even if you intend to use it off camera since the Godox system does not require to place the body in the WL position
    • Problem Description – Sony ZV-E10 II A few weeks ago, I purchased my Sony ZV-E10 II camera from Digital Photo Supply. The unit is updated to the latest available firmware and is showing an abnormal behavior in the continuous autofocus system (AF-C), which can be consistently reproduced under different conditions and with various native Sony lenses. Observed Symptoms The parameters for focus transition speed (AF Transition Speed) and subject shift sensitivity (AF Subject Shift Sensitivity) do not remain stable. When the camera encounters a point or surface with low texture or contrast and takes time to focus, instead of maintaining smooth “focus breathing” according to the settings, it makes a sudden jump to focus. From that moment, autofocus behaves as if the speed were set to the highest value, completely ignoring the configured settings. After a few seconds, or when reframing, the system resumes normal operation. This phenomenon occurs even with Active Stabilization, Face/Eye AF, and Touch Tracking turned off. Testing Methodology Tests were conducted under various lighting conditions, both high-contrast and flat light. Different subjects were positioned at varying depth distances but laterally aligned (scenarios with partially overlapping elements). Medium and low focus transition speeds and medium or low subject sensitivity settings were used—these are the cinematic parameters I normally work with. All tests were performed exclusively with native Sony lenses, varying light and contrast levels to check behavioral consistency. Under these conditions, the camera consistently showed instances where, when using Spot Focus (S/M/L), it would momentarily lose focus and, upon regaining it, start focusing instantly on any new subject as the camera moved—completely ignoring the configured transition speeds. Control Camera Used A Sony ZV-E10 (Mark I) was used as a reference with identical lenses, settings, subjects, and lighting conditions. It passed all tests successfully without reproducing the issue. Impact on Professional Use This malfunction is catastrophic for my professional video work, where precise and fluid focus transitions are critical. When the system ignores transition speed and sensitivity settings, the footage becomes unusable, directly affecting visual continuity and cinematic quality. If this behavior cannot be corrected, the camera is unsuitable for professional video use, as it compromises focus system stability and predictability.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...