Jump to content

Problem with Sony A7R III Long exposure noise reduction


Recommended Posts

I just took a few long exposure photos (exposure between 5 and 8 minutes) with long exposure noise reduction turned on, and notice that some hot pixels remained.

This is the second A7RIII I have and it didnt happen with the other one (images would come out with no hot pixels at all). Is this a bad copy or did I get lucky with the first one?

Also, I'm not sure if that matters, but the lens cap was not on when the camera was taking the second exposure for noise reduction.

Using dark frame subtraction would be a problem for me because I keep the filter adapter on all the time, and wouldn't want to take it off everytime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 7/9/2019 at 2:41 PM, zzzbob said:

I just took a few long exposure photos (exposure between 5 and 8 minutes) with long exposure noise reduction turned on, and notice that some hot pixels remained.

This is the second A7RIII I have and it didnt happen with the other one (images would come out with no hot pixels at all). Is this a bad copy or did I get lucky with the first one?

Also, I'm not sure if that matters, but the lens cap was not on when the camera was taking the second exposure for noise reduction.

Using dark frame subtraction would be a problem for me because I keep the filter adapter on all the time, and wouldn't want to take it off everytime.

Hi - Supposedly there is a 'work-around' that triggers a Sony cameras' hot-pixel mapping routine.

You go into the camera's menu and set the date to some future period (a month-or-two). Then cycle the camera's power on-off. When the camera is turned off there is supposed to be a noticably increased delay from when you turn the power off and the 'thunk' is heard inside the camera. Then turn the camera back on and go into the date/time menu and set it back to the present. At this point the camera is supposed to have remapped its sensor's hot-pixels.

I'm curious ... what kind of 'filter adapter' do you have on your camera ?

- Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
    • Well this! Thank you! I have been following suggestion after suggestion for the past 3 hours with my a7CR and never thought of removing the battery. Magic!
    • I recently got an a7cii and to pair with the compact body, I thought of getting 2 of the trio compact lenses, 24mm F2.8 and 40mm F4.0. (I already have a 70-200mm) However I stumbled upon the newly released 24-50mm F2.8 G. I'm not sure which to get - I like the small factor of the prime lenses ON the body because it's discreet and helps me blend in as an average tourist / doesn't make it obvious when doing street. But if I add the dimensions of the 2 primes together, it takes up more space in the bag than the zoom lens. BUT THEN, the weight of the 2 prime lenses is 110g lesser than the zoom lens. The zoom lens has the added benefit of being more versatile.   So now I'm stumped. Each has their pros and cons and I can't decide which to get. I'd like to hear the views of you guys who are more experts at this.   Edit: I'm a bit concerned about weight because the last time I went overseas my shoulders were aching from carrying too much. Which is why I was looking for small compact primes in the first place.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...