Jump to content

Tilt Shift with XPAN lenses?


Recommended Posts

Does anyone know of a manufacturer making a tilt/shift adapter that would use Hassleblad/Fuji XPAN lenses.  The image circle is well over 65mm, and the lenses are outstanding and very small for being medium format in coverage (90mm f4 is smaller than FE 50/1.8).  I am surely not the only one to think of this.  It would make an extremely small and light landscape & product setup that would provide a tremendous level of technical camera/lens movement.

 

Shouldn’t be hard to get Kiron to make it since they already make an XPAN to E adapter, just not the T/S version like they do for Nikon F, Olympus OM, & C/Y

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just adapt the N/F version to your E-mount body  ? 

  

That possibility is prolly the reason they don't feel obliged 

to build a version direct-fitting to E-mount. Like ... doesn't 

EVERY [geeky/techie/advanced] E-mount user already 

have a N/F adapter in use already ? Acoarst they do :-) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you are talking about since there are no XPAN to Nikon F adapters since the registration distance on XPAN is about 12mm shorter than Nikon F, hence no adapting them with a Nikon-E adapter, unless you are only shooting macro, and I specifically stated this would be for landscape and products. 

 (You can get an N/F lens to XPAN mount adapter, but why would you want to put a big clunky and inferior uncoupled 35mm Nikon lens on a 65mm image circle rangefinder body via an adapter? Makes no sense)

 

Nikon F T/S lenses are large/heavy/expensive/scarce and not able to offer the same image circle or movements, and are overpriced for the optics. Canon EF T/S glass is good, but large, heavy and overpriced as well.

Nikon F lenses, or any other conventional 35mm lens via a T/S adapter are unsuitable due to the fact that they will not cover full frame once any lens movements have been made. They only work for APSC.

 

A direct E-XPAN T/S adapter is the only way to make it work, and would offer superior performance, size/weight, and value vs. other options.

Why not just adapt the N/F version to your E-mount body  ? 

  

That possibility is prolly the reason they don't feel obliged 

to build a version direct-fitting to E-mount. Like ... doesn't 

EVERY [geeky/techie/advanced] E-mount user already 

have a N/F adapter in use already ? Acoarst they do :-) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'm beginning to think that I have a misconception about the a7R. The one I was wanting had the shutter release button on the hand grip with a resolution of 36mp. It appears the button moved to the handgrip on the a7R II model, which had 42mp resolution.  Sorry for any confusion, I'm in the learning stage yet.  😕 I may need to go with the basic a7 II at 24mp. The 36mp (R) model had the shutter release on the camera body (which I didn't care for).
    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...