Jump to content

Recommended Posts

`

   

   

Equivalent FF FOV = 85mm is great for ordinary close 

focus images, and for much closer work, the FOV gets 

tighter due to its legacy focusing system. IOW, at half 

life size the FOV narrows to be about 110mm [ = FF].   

    

If I were using my modern 60mm the FOV would not 

tighten up like that. So the 55 leaves a bit more room 

to light the subject. And acoarst the focusing rail is my 

salvation. I can hardly imagine working without it after 

first deploying it decades ago. 

  

The lens and focus rail are at least 40 yrs old ... maybe

50. The camera is "legacy" in digital terms, a Nex-7. It 

doesn't have the high ISO ability of cameras just a few

years younger, but macro on Podzilla doesn't need high 

ISO like my other interests require. And, at minimal ISO 

there's no reason to deploy the a7II plus the longer lens 

that it would need for the same result. 

   

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  

     

   

   

 

FWIW TWIMC etc .... rig also includes Metabones E-NF

converter and Globuscope thingy under the rails [yellow 

bubble levels]. The Globus thingy raises the Novoflex so

that the drive knobs aren't crushed against the platform

on Podzilla, so it's required even if a camera has built-in

two-axis on-screen leveling. Acoarst Podzilla also has a 

pair of levels, but the bubbles have grown kinda huge :-( 

Thaz cuz Podzilla is also a legacy item ... an ancient Slik

that can manage an 8x10 monorail view, at 11 feet, in a  

a stiff breeze :-) 

   

Also, a skylight filter is hardly necessary to a macro rig, 

but it's included just to irritate those who are irritated by 

skylight filters }:-)     

   

   

  

`

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ISO 320 is the A7R5's second base ISO setting. You will find at ISO 320 you will get better results than even ISO 200. I normally take a set of shots at 1600, 3200 and 6400 ISO. I am taking 60 light frames and 10 dark frames. I don't do any adjustments to the files before stacking. I really need to get organised and do some bias frames now. Here is pretty much my first successful Milky Way shot from a few months ago. I was combatting a bit of ambient light and quite a lot of cloud but I'm pretty happy with this. It was shot using my Sigma 16-28 f2.8 which is better at astro than I had anticipated, at ISO 1600.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Thanks for the information. Since my original post, I did some "experiments" at different iso settings. Best results were obtained at iso 320, and then increasing the exposure by four stops in Lightroom. The biggest difference compared to using a higher iso was that there was detail in dark foreground areas, while at high iso the dark areas were blocked. This is consistent with articles I've read about ISO invariance.
    • I do a bit of astro photography and do a lot of research etc. on best settings to use. I have never heard of anyone using ISO bracketing! Typically, higher ISO settings such as 1600, 3200 or 6400 are used and multiple light and dark frames are stacked to reduce noise. If you are worried about noise in dark foreground areas then just use a seperate exposure for them then blend the exposures in post processing. By the way, I also have an A7R5.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...