Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HI guys,

 

I am considering to buy an A6500 and a Zhiyun Crane gimbal.

I want to use the A6500 for video and spherical 360 photography (for Google Street View).

The gimbal can be mounted and remote controlled to make a horizontal turn.

Do you know if it is possible to make a (preferably one-shot) full spherical 360 picture with this set up using the Panorama Sweep mode?

 

Thanks in advance.

Riaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it's not. Not in a single sweep anyway.   

   

The camera will report error if you sweep either 

too fast or too slow, and the correct speed range 

is pretty narrow. 360 would require you to sweep 

too fast and result in an error message. Correct

sweep speed allows time for about 150 degrees, 

+/-, depending on lens, with horizontal camera. 

Vertical camera will sweep a narrower angle. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not that I know of for stills.

 

In my opinion gimbals for SLRs are a lot more difficult to use than they're made out to be. I tried to use one with my SLR for a solid year! Even when I did finally get the hang of it it resulted in so many outtakes I had to edit out that it just wasn't worth it anymore. That's what they don't show you online, all the outtakes!

 

I had better stability buy using a large strong elastic camera strap and wrapping it around my body.

 

$200+ for a gimbal? Sony offers camcorders like the PJ540 and PJ670 or AX33 with gimbal lenses. These work MUCH better and are very easy to use. Also the camcorders offer some features that SLRs don't (and can't under the EU tax code, this still applies no matter where you live since they're all made this way by every brand).

 

I got a PJ540 and never looked back.

 

That said, Sony's mirrorless SLRs are still by far the best for video.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it's not. Not in a single sweep anyway.

 

The camera will report error if you sweep either

too fast or too slow, and the correct speed range

is pretty narrow. 360 would require you to sweep

too fast and result in an error message. Correct

sweep speed allows time for about 150 degrees,

+/-, depending on lens, with horizontal camera.

Vertical camera will sweep a narrower angle.

Thanks for the info! I thought it could have been a fast and simple way to create a 360 without stitching software. But it isn't.

I have also contacted the Sony support and they also confirm that there isn't a Sony camera that is able to make a 360 panorama.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn LG-H850 met Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not that I know of for stills.

 

In my opinion gimbals for SLRs are a lot more difficult to use than they're made out to be. I tried to use one with my SLR for a solid year! Even when I did finally get the hang of it it resulted in so many outtakes I had to edit out that it just wasn't worth it anymore. That's what they don't show you online, all the outtakes!

 

I had better stability buy using a large strong elastic camera strap and wrapping it around my body.

 

$200+ for a gimbal? Sony offers camcorders like the PJ540 and PJ670 or AX33 with gimbal lenses. These work MUCH better and are very easy to use. Also the camcorders offer some features that SLRs don't (and can't under the EU tax code, this still applies no matter where you live since they're all made this way by every brand).

 

I got a PJ540 and never looked back.

 

That said, Sony's mirrorless SLRs are still by far the best for video.

Thanks @Dollanger! I think I will rent a gimbal first prior to buying one, if still needed.

I am considering to buy a camcorder (i think it will be the jvc gy-hm170, because of the xlr-connectors and ability to shoot 4k) for video, mainly because the sony dslr's have overheating problems. If Sony could fix this and also offered a paid update to record 30+ minutes, like Panasonic does, it would have been a very reliable camera, even for professional use.

Thanks for your input. I appreciate it!

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn LG-H850 met Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...