Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have both the a7s and the a6300. I have been very happy with the look of the video coming straight out of the a7s standard settings (i usually dont have the luxery of time to deal with s-log etc).

 

I film a lot of interviews and all the highlights and the parts of a face that sometime end up a bit ugly and overexposed (unless you underexpose the rest of the face) on pro camcorders ten times as expensive with smaller sensors and even on the m43 cameras looks stunning straight out of the camera without having to go the s-log route.

 

Recently i bought the a6300 as an extra camera. Mostly because of the incredibly AF. It is a great camera in most ways and I know this is capable of producing beautiful video when using picture profiles with added dynamic range. But after using it just in the standard mode I just dont like the look. It is OK. But it reminds me a lot of the video you get from the m43 cameras. The highlights are OK but not beautiful and the picture just feels kind of "flat" and "dead". I feel like the result is similar on the a7s when using the crop mode. The look is very different from the full frame mode.   

 

Is this only because the a7s is a full frame camera with more dynamic range because of the sensor size and the a6300 is "only" super 35?

 

Or is it also due to the quality of the a6300 (which is much cheaper)? 

 

Do others experience a big difference when working with full frame vs super 35 for video?

    

Would love to hear other peoples experience with the two formats. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Like Cameratose, I usually go for as much depth of field as I can, but sometimes there is no getting around out of focus areas, such as a closeup of a cactus flower.  I guess, everything else being equal, I might be concerned about a lenses bokeh, but everything else is seldom equal.  At this point in my photography I think I have bigger problems than unattractive bokeh.
    • I elected to upgrade from Sony A1 to the A1 ii and am seeing some significant focusing challenges in the little time I've spent with it so far. Less than 10% of photos appear to be in focus when photographing small birds in subject mode birds with seemingly no improvement when subject mode is changed to birds/animals/people. Scenario: Sony A1 ii, 200-600 G lens @ 600mm, F6.3, shutter speed on male cardinal (in-focus mostly) at 1/250 ISO 125 and female cardinal (nothing in focus) at 1/1600 ISO 100; AF-C set with eye supposedly in focus in both shots. Lens has AF on, OSS on, Mode 1. I've tried switching out lenses using 100-400 with and without 1.4X converter and used handheld and used tripod. Photos are at a distance of 20-25 yards. The photos below are within a couple yards of one another. There is seemingly no improvement in AF performance despite the combinations of lens, tripod and focus zones attempted. Birds are stationary. Many of the photos will have everything in the frame seemingly out of focus and some may have the head in focus and rest of body out of focus and immediate area around bird slightly out of focus at F9-F11. I considered that I was cropping too much and had pixel peeping / expectations problem, but some photos are wildly out of focus when supposedly focusing on eye or body. Neither photo below is cropped. Ideas are welcome!

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Agreed, but it's ancient thinking. Any modern forum lets you edit whenever. It's simply a setting they could click to turn off. It's one reason I won't post many photos here. After 10 minutes I lose complete control over my own property. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...