Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I bought the camera almost a month ago. I can't charge it using the AC adapter: the charge light does not come on, nor does the battery charge increase. I can charge the battery if the camera is connected directly to a computer, using the micro USB cable, but that same cable won't work with the AC adapter. I got a replacement AC adapter from B&H but the problem is the same. And it turns out not to be an adapter issue, as I can plug my phone into the adapter and it works fine. I'm assuming it must be a software or firmware issue. I've contacted Sony but their only suggestion was to send the camera to Precision Camera Repair in Connecticut, their authorized repair service. However, I don't want to do that because I'll be without the camera for weeks and also because Precision Camera is notorious for poor service (Google them, you'll be shocked).

 

I've thought about returning the camera to B&H and getting a new one, but am not sure if mine still counts as new after my using it for a month.

 

Any suggestions would be welcome. Has anyone else had this issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using the cable that came with the camera, but it has no label or writing of any kind except for the letter B at the Micro USB (camera) end. I've also tried another Micro USB cable that works with other devices, but that doesn't charge the camera either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Precision Camera has improved somewhat, but still, you don't want to send the camera into them if you can avoid it.  Why not buy a new A7R2, switch the ac adapter and cable, and return the new one with the old charger stuff. Then there's no issue about 30 days, or if the camera is still in "like new" condition. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...