Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bought a second-hand SAL70300 SSM recently, and it came with an LA-EA1 adapter. Autofocus works fine, face detection works. There's no vignetting. So, I thought what's the point upgrading to EA3 adapter. Would there be any other advantages that I'm missing? I'm not using any other A-mount lenses. Just it happened that I got this combination on Marketplace very very cheap...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sony created a word of confusion with their adapters. Some are APS-C, some are FF, some are AF, some are not. 

 

The LA-EA1 is an APS-C adapter and automatically sets the camera to APS-C. You need the LA-EA3 for Full Frame use.

Fortunately, Sony has a comprehensive website that lets you poke around based on camera model, adapter, lens, etc. This link should take you to the LA-EA1 site, click on the camera selector and find your camera to see compatibility. Also note that lens functions vary, some will track, some won't, etc. You can also click to the other adapters and compare them. Note that the LA-EA5 is only fully functional with the A7 RIV (maybe A7 IV?) and newer cameras. 

LA-EA1 : Interchangeable Lens Camera α [E-mount] Compatibility Information

Edited by Cameratose
Link to post
Share on other sites

Like @Cameratose said: your camera will automatically switch to APS-C mode so you might not immediately notice something is 'wrong'. You should note however that in APS-C mode your A7ii is only using like 45% of its total sensor area. So:

13 minutes ago, MtlAlfa2024 said:

I’m wondering if AE1 + A7ii in APS-C mode reduce the photo quality? 

Yes, you're shooting at 11 megapixels instead of 24 and have some reduced dynamic range compared to using the full sensor area.

14 minutes ago, MtlAlfa2024 said:

I called the seller he said he had no problem pairing with his 7Aiv.

If you went to a physical store and bought this adapter based on the sellers advise, I'd definitely request a refund as the seller provided you with poor, incomplete advise. No there are no 'problems' pairing it with the A7iv, but at the same time you're crippling the potential of your setup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course he had 'no problem', it will work but it's going to be APS-C (or Super 35), so you're not using the entire sensor, just the center of it. The formula is full MP / 1.5 /1.5, so 24/1.5/1.5 = 10.67MP.

Not only will you experience what @Pieter said, but your focal length equivalent is 105-450mm when using the lens. You won't get 70mm out of it. If that's ok then keep it. If not, then send it back if possible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I've been using this lens extensively without any sharpness issues. At long focal lengths, you'll have to factor in the need for a faster shutter speed (< 1/500-ish at 350mm) and other factors like atmospheric distortion, fog/dust haze, etc. All these factors contribute to a deterioration of image quality at longer focal lengths.
    • That's supposed to be a pretty good APS-C lens. Can you try it on a different camera just for the heck of it? Friend? Camera shop? The lens is noted for sharpness, so if you're having as much trouble as you say, you may want to look into a replacement or repair. 
    • Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to the community because I’m facing a persistent image quality issue with my Sony 70–350mm f/4.5–6.3 G OSS lens, and I’d like to know if this is normal behavior or if my copy is defective. Problem description: I’ve extensively compared the 70–350mm G OSS with my Sony 18–135mm f/3.5–5.6 OSS, using a Sony A6700, under controlled conditions: • Identical lighting and background • Same subject and position (LEGO figure, consistent framing) • Tripod or steady support • Manual focus or AF with center point • Same shutter speed (e.g., 1/200s), similar ISO (ISO 4000–6400), RAW + JPEG • OIS turned on (and also tested with OIS off) My observations: • At 135mm, the 70–350mm G OSS delivers softer, flatter images than the 18–135mm, even when stopped down. • At 350mm, the sharpness drops significantly – the center is soft, and textures (like LEGO tiles or fabric) appear blurred or smudged. • Contrast and micro-detail are noticeably inferior across all focal lengths. • The 18–135mm at 135mm (even cropped) retains better edge sharpness and detail definition. • Both JPEG and RAW files confirm the issue – this is not just JPEG processing or noise reduction. Question to the community: • Have others experienced similar softness with the 70–350mm? • Is it possible I have a decentered or optically misaligned copy? • Is there a known issue with OSS introducing softness at long focal lengths? I wanted to love this lens due to the range and portability, but currently it’s unusable for anything where image quality matters. I’m considering returning or sending it for service. Thanks in advance for any feedback or comparison results you can share.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...