Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please note this is the 7S****iii 

I have tried the Godox TT685II-S. This flash would not fire, it is hot shoe mount. I checked the guide in the box and the 7s was not listed. I am seeking a hot shoe mount flash that has a Manuel mode that someone is actively shooting with. In my research I’m just not finding anything… thank you so much for your support! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response @Cameratose. Again I’m looking for someone who is currently shooting with an a7siii and wanting to know what flash they are using. I went to a photo supply today and they were unsure as well as to why it wouldn’t fire with godox 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is exactly why you should be contacting Godox customer service rather than hoping to find a needle in a haystack. They're the experts, it's their flash. They can tell you if it will or won't work. Good luck. 

Edited by Cameratose
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2025 at 10:36 PM, hillary said:

Please note this is the 7S****iii 

I have tried the Godox TT685II-S. This flash would not fire, it is hot shoe mount. I checked the guide in the box and the 7s was not listed. I am seeking a hot shoe mount flash that has a Manuel mode that someone is actively shooting with. In my research I’m just not finding anything… thank you so much for your support! 
 

@Cameratose thank you for your response. If you see my original post you will see that the insert in the godbox did not have my camera listed. I am seeking someone who is actively shooting with the A7siii, and the flash that they have found has worked for them. Thanks! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, so the smart thing to do is hope that someone comes along, rather than contact the people who actually manufacture the flash and get a factual answer. Proof that you can lead a horse to water... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Hola, parece que estan agotados, saludos Felipe 
    • I'd suggest you start by running a simple test.  Take pictures of a typical scene/subject and each of the JPEG settings your camera offers.  Then compare them in the output that you normally produce.  You may or may not see a difference.  I normally shoot at the highest JPEG level and save that file -- but make a smaller file (lower resolution) for normal/typical use. There's plenty of editing that you can do with JPEGs on your computer -- depending on your software -- and there are features in your camera that can help out, as well.  That depends on your camera.  Put them together, and it might meet your needs.  For example, your camera probably has several bracketing features that will take the same shot with different settings with one press of the button.  Then you can select the best JPEG to work with on your computer.  I frequently use this feature to control contrast.
    • If you set up some basic presets in your processing software and use batch processing, you don't need jpeg at all. I shoot RAW only, use (free) Faststone Image Viewer which will view any type of image file to cull my shots, and batch process in Darktable. I can start with 2000-3000 shots and in a matter of a few hours have them culled, processed, and posted. A handful of shots, say a couple hundred from a photo walk, are done in minutes.  This saves card space, computer space, and upload time.  The results are very good for posting online. When someone wants to buy one or I decide to print it, I can then return to the RAW file and process it individually for optimum results.  I never delete a RAW file. Sometimes I'll return to an old shot I processed several years ago and reprocess it. I have been very surprised how much better they look as my processing skills improved.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...