Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm finding a huge amount of noise and banding in the sky in footage from my last video shoot with my a7s II. It's probably unusable, so I'm looking for some help in identifying the issue and finding better settings for future shoots.

Attached to this post are screenshots from Premiere of the raw footage, and the same clip after adding a basic S-curve, 100 Contract, and 200 Saturation, using the Lumetri Color effect. Also, a closeup of the noise so you can see how bad it is. 

As you can see, I tried to overexpose so that my blacks and shadows were all above the 50 mark on my waveform. The meter on the camera read 2.0 exposure. I was on 1600 ISO, which I believe is the native level that should produce the cleanest image. The only other factor worth mentioning is that I had a variable ND filter on, though I'd be surprised if that could cause this sort of issue. The rest of the settings are listed below.

I understand that it's an 8-bit camera and a blue gradient like this can be tricky to reproduce, but surely there must be a way to film a clear blue sky in S-log3 and achieve at least decent results. Or should I simply avoid using this log profile for sunny days and gradients?

I've seen a lot of other threads on this topic and tried to use recommended practices in this shoot – especially the standard procedure to overexpose by 2.0 – but the results are so bad that I'm wondering if I'm missing something bigger.

Thanks!

CAMERA SETTINGS:

  • Shutter 1/50
  • Aperture F7.1
  • ISO 1600
  • WB 5500K
  • XAVC 4K / 24p 100M
  • Picture Effect: OFF

PICTURE PROFILE:

  • Black Level 0
  • Gamma > S-log3
  • Black Gamma > Middle / Level 0
  • Knee > Auto
  • Color Mode > S-Gamut3.Cine
  • Saturation 0
  • Color Phase 0
  • Color Depth 0
  • Detail > Level 0 0 0 0 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Makeev said:

This is a codec problem in the entire A7/A6XXX variations.

Thanks for your answer. So, you're saying that there's simply no way of properly shooting a clear blue sky while using S-log3? The footage will always have this kind of noise and banding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Isaak said:

Thanks for your answer. So, you're saying that there's simply no way of properly shooting a clear blue sky while using S-log3? The footage will always have this kind of noise and banding?

You can try to use the Atomos Ninja V recorder. But our Sony cameras are limited to 8-bit via HDMI. So the solution is only partial and post processing will not be complete anyway. We should wait for Sony A7s3 or similar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Log3 is a tough puppy to grade. I've never found those nasty artifacts or such severe banding in the Log2 I shoot using same camera.

Pulled this example from 2 years ago. Shadows -100%. Midtones - 87%. Global saturation 21%. No LUT applied yet and still not the banding or artifacts your Slog3 is producing. The external recorder files recorded would yield better results but this shows what 8 bit Slog2 internal produces. You generally won't appreciate the difference 10 bit makes until it's placed SxS on a frame where color is important. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by VTC
Link to post
Share on other sites

This the first time noticing this or shooting Slog3? How about Drop Boxing a short segment that hasn't been rendered in Premier and let me see what it looks like in DaVinci or Final Cut. Premier could be contributing to this somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Wow, we have two distinctly different trains of thought. I'm not sure how valuable my advice will be, just consider this something to toss around in the back of your mind. First off, I hate rangefinder style bodies, never could get on with them. The decision of whether to go with a full-size body wasn't even in play. The difference when looking at size comparison photos is considerable, the difference in practical use is minor. About the only time I can think of that it may be beneficial is street if you want to conceal yourself a bit.  Lenses: Size and weight don't bother me near as much as inconvenience. Who in the heck wants to be changing lenses all the time? I take a short zoom, a long zoom, and a medium-wide fast prime for indoors. That's it. I am hoping Sigma's 20-200 set to be released tomorrow isn't a turd, if it's decent it will replace my 24-105.  If I were to go on a trip today, my setup would be: A1 70-200/2.8 GM II 24-105 Samyang 24/1.8.  If I was feeling it, I might add the 2X TC for the GM II, but I doubt it'd even get used.  An alternative to the 70-200 + TC would be the Tamron 50-400.  BOTH of these setups fit nicely in my Tenba Solstice 10L Sling.  So, I would say yes. Trade up to the A7R V. Definitely get the 24-70, or maybe the 24-105 for more range. You don't need 2.8 for your described subject matter.  As an aside, I never, ever, ever shoot in crop mode. Why? Well, I can do the exact same thing in post on my computer. They're both just electronic crops. I end up with a lot more information that way, and who knows, if I'm going to crop anyway, maybe there's a better composition hidden in the full frame image that I didn't see when I made the shot? Much easier to remove content than to add it.  
    • Hi all, For about the last 1.5 years I've been using the Sony a7CR combined with the 24-50mm f2.8 G lens as one of the lenses that basically lives on my camera. Besides this I have the following lenses as well: Sony 16-25mm f2.8 G Sony 14mm f1.8 GM Sony 40mm f2.5 G Sigma 85mm f1.4 On my last travel I took the above mentioned lenses with me + the 24-50 G. Would have most likely taken the Sony 14mm f1.8 GM but I didn't own this yet at the time. For my next travel I do want to take this as well so then my setup would look like: Sony 24-50mm f2.8 G Sony 16-25mm f2.8 G Sony 40mm f2.5 G Sigma 85mm f1.4 Sony 14mm f1.8 GM At this point I feel like I'm kinda reaching a bit of a limit in terms of lenses I want to take with me during travel, especially the 85mm. I wish to use it more but noticed I often left it at the hotel/apartment room I was staying at. Initially I bought the a7CR for weight savings but as time has passed I do feel certain limits with the setup especially during travel/landscape (as this is my main form of photography). And that's mainly coming from the amount of lenses I'm taking. I have been considering to trade in the 24-50 G lens to the 24-70 GMII to use on my a7CR but after using my Sigma 85mm f1.4 for an extended time on my a7CR it does feel uncomfortable to use due to the front heavy nature of the setup. The 24-70 GMII would be about the same weight as the Sigma. One option would be to use the extended grip on my a7CR, this certainly makes handling a lot better of bigger lenses but I usually have my setup hanging from the Peak Design Capture Clip on my backpack and I'm not sure if the extended grip really designed to take this much weight to be fair. Maybe anyone here has experience with this? So what this leads me to was the consideration to upgrade to the a7RV + Sony 24-70 GMII as there are some good trade in deals going on right now where I'm at. I'm not sure is this setup an absolute overkill for a hobbyist photographer... :) The benefits of this upgrade would be to have less need for changing lenses during travel and reduce the amount of separate lenses I have to take with me. The overall weight would however be approx. the same that goes in my backpack. Usually when I'm out for hikes I will currently only take the 16-25 & 24-50 with me. With this setup the reach feels limiting even with cropping the 50mm to 75mm (still approx. 26MP on the a7CR after crop). What I usually use my setup for: Landscape photography Travel Portrait Astrophotography I was wondering is there anyone here who went from a lighter a7CR (or similar) setup to a slightly heavier setup to carry around during hikes etc. Did you regret it or was the tradeoff worth it? As mentioned I do feel like my current setup is somewhat limiting and realized that switching lenses during travel is an absolute pain in the ass. But I'm not sure if the extra 450gr (about 1 lb) is worth the tradeoff. I know the decision is ultimately up to me but just like to hear your thoughts on this upgrade, and if the additional features & image quality in trade for weight would be worth it as well. TL;DR: Looking to upgrade my a7CR 24-50G f2.8 setup to a7RV with 24-70GMII f2.8 lens, not sure if it's worth it with the additional weight in trade for more versatility and better IQ. Thanks in advance for your replies!
    • I got one tuned up pretty well last year. I don’t remember exactly after doing a 77ii not too far apart that was different. The a68 was faster and more accurate but color profile was more work to tune btw. profile/style set to clear and highest sharpness allowed + micro focus adjustments per lens if I remember right. And any of these fall apart fast in low light or slow lenses. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...