Jump to content

Old Vintage Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f 1.4 Still Shines!


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I just ordered a used one for my Sony A7II which I also recently purchased.

Is it easy and quick to focus?

It's very easy, quick comes with practice.  Here is a nice blog piece about manual lenses on the A7 family (many Rokkors) along with introductions to several focusing techniques.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice, got the same lens that I used on my father's XD-7 back in the 80s along with a 28 f3.5 & a 135 f3.5.

 

Bought a cheap adapter to use it on my A6000, I'll definitely have to give it a go these days.

 

Indeed, manual focus got very easy with focus peaking on those Sony cameras, used to it from macro photography on the A77 II.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using the same lenses on my a7, with similar results. What Minolta wide angle glass do you recommend? Any preferred adapter?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

I can vouch for the 35/1.8. I have the old MC version (the MD is optically the same, maybe with improved coating); even wide open it is really quite sharp on the A7r, and the bokeh is extremely pleasing. It reminds me of the Voigtlander 35/1.2.

 

As an adapter I use a K&F; you can read more about these here on the forum:

 

     A good brand of cheap Chinese adapters    

 

My sample of the adapter has a light leak where the release button is if used in bright daylight (with light shining directly on top of the affected part) with shutter times in the order of 8 seconds or more (basically using an ND1000 filter or shooting in the deep of the woods with a stray ray of light hitting the adapter).

 

I managed to solve this anyway cracking the adapter open (just 3 screws) and putting a bit of gaffer tape underneath the lens mount in the same position where the release button is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I forgot.

 

If for Minolta you count as well Minolta-made Leica M glass then the M-Rokkor 28/2.8 is absolutely one of my all-times favorite lens. I've shot with it on Leica M6 (film), Nex 7 and now A7r.

 

Sharp, nice contrast, and with an extremely pleasing ("film-like, for lack of a better term) way of rendering the images it captures. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. You read my mind, as I was going to ask about the M-Rokkor 28-2.8.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

 

If you want you can also check an old review of mine that I did for my first sample of the lens (one full of "bubbles"):

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2012/01/15/review-minolta-m-rokkor-28mm-f28-for-leica-m/

 

Since then I managed to buy an almost mint sample. Guess what? The new one is a bit more resistant to flare, but if I had to guess I think the older one with all the bubbles was a tiny tiny bit sharper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daily kit: A7R + MD Rokkor 50mm f1.4 + MD Rokkor 24mm f2.8.

Both lenses are superb.... The 24mm is really gorgeous..... The only bad thing, but I read that may be "only" a 7R problem, is the color shift with red/yellow dominants when used at the maximum aperture..... But I love the results !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daily kit: A7R + MD Rokkor 50mm f1.4 + MD Rokkor 24mm f2.8.

Both lenses are superb.... The 24mm is really gorgeous..... The only bad thing, but I read that may be "only" a 7R problem, is the color shift with red/yellow dominants when used at the maximum aperture..... But I love the results !! :D

 

May I ask, do you have the 49 or the 55mm filter ring version of the 24? I'm shopping for one of these, and since there are two different optical schemes and different opinions about which one is better I'd like to know your sample which one is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phillip, it was your manual tutorial that got me to try the Minolta lenses. As luck would have it, my family all shot Minolta a few decades back. So there are a series of legacy lenses around for me to play with. I'm repairing two older lenses now, and will let you know how it turns out.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I, too, have a Minolta Rokkor 50 1.4 and love it. I saved mine from a dingy old pawnshop in the bad part of town. It was covered in a layer of dust and probably hadn't seen the sunshine in a decade. The macro was shot using a $10 Minolta 1:1 extension tube (I believe it was made for the 50mm 3.5 macro) that I bought out of the used bin in a local camera shop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Posts

    • I'd really like to find a package deal for an a7R (mk I, second generation) which includes the neckstrap and box. I've searched Ebay and currently no one is listing what I'm looking for. They either have the camera only or a first generation a7R and a lot of them don't offer the Sony neckstrap or box it came in. I know your site doesn't have a formal 'Equipment For Sale' thread and granted Ebay is a better place to sell gear but I thought I'd see if any of the members have one and would like to upgrade to a newer model but don't think anyone would be looking for one that old. The cameras I've been using are in the 20 megapixel range and rather than jumping to a 40mp camera due to file size, the 36mp that the first a7R has was appealing to me and wouldn't break the bank. I've been using Canon and Nikon but really want experience a Sony. If a post like this is undesirable for this website, I understand but I thought I would ask. Thank you. 
    • Here's a good thread on the issue.... https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4571046 And here is the info on the A7RIVA that maybe explains why I don't see the issue...  The change in wording that caught my attention is that the new A7RIVA brochure says the structure has been "re-examined and redesigned." Don't know, but given the text of other parts of the brochures are copied word for word, the change in text here seems significant. My reading of this is that it is a redesign of the A7RIV. In that case, perhaps the 200-600 issues are less severe with the new body.
    • I'd opt for a small zoom, but I must admit that there seems to be a dearth of lenses in the e-mount in the 24-50mm range -- for some reason.  I have a small 24-70mm, but that's an a-mount Tamron.  Maybe you can find something by looking at lenses slightly longer.  I have a heavy, but small 24-100mm a-mount, and Tokina made a 24-200mm a-mount.  Maybe there are similar lenses in the e-mount.  Kill three birds with one stone.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...